• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库核心期刊
Quick Search Issue Search Advanced Search
TANG Yaming, FENG Wei, BI Yinqiang, BI Junbo. 2015: The classification and features of loess landslide based on risk assessment. Geological Bulletin of China, 34(11): 2092-2099.
Citation: TANG Yaming, FENG Wei, BI Yinqiang, BI Junbo. 2015: The classification and features of loess landslide based on risk assessment. Geological Bulletin of China, 34(11): 2092-2099.
shu

The classification and features of loess landslide based on risk assessment

  • Xi’an Center of Geological Survey, China Geology Survey, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China;2. Key Laboratory for Geo-hazards in Loess Area, Ministry of Land and Resources, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China

More Information
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Some researchers have classified the loess landslides in the light of geological conditions, origins, thickness, and failure mechanics. However, no researchers have made the classification according to the risk assessment requirement. This paper introduced the landslide classification methods abroad and summarized the landslide classifications in China’s mainland. On such a basis, the authors put forward the classification method for loess landslides based on the view point of risk assessment. The method considers the kinematics characteristics and the magnitude or speed of landslides comprehensively so as to form a two-dimensional classification table. According to the table, loess landslides can be divided into seven kinds, i.e., peel, topple, fall, slump, slide, mudflow, and complex. Each kind of landslides has its own characteristics of deformation and kinematics, and possesses its unique magnitude, velocity, and sliding distance; hence, its features of risk are different from those of others. In the end, the authors analyzed the different risk features of various kinds of loess landslides.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (0)
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    ZHANG Chenghang, WANG Jiayun, GAO Bo, FENG Wei. 2015: Risk quantitative evaluation for Xujia Village loess landslide, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province. Geological Bulletin of China, 34(11): 2138-2142.
    MENG Qing-hua, SUN Wei-feng, ZHANG Chun-shan, WANG Tao, XIN Peng, LI Zhi-ke. 2011: Risk assessment of Hujiashan landslide in Baoji area, Shaanxi. Geological Bulletin of China, 30(7): 1155-1165.
    XU Qiang, ZHANG Yi-fan, CHEN Wei. 2010: Vulnerability assessment of geo-hazards in southwest mountainous area—Danba County, Sichuan, China as an example.. Geological Bulletin of China, 29(5): 729-738.
    HE Shu-jun, ZHANG Chun-shan, CHEN Zhi-hua, WU Shu-ren, XIN Peng, YE Si-yuan. 2009: Risk evaluation for Xiayahe landslide in Weibin District, Baoji City, Shaanxi Province, China. Geological Bulletin of China, 28(8): 1064-1076.
    ZHANG Chun-shan, HE Shu-jun, XIN Peng, SUN Wei-feng, TAN Cheng-xuan, WU Shu-ren, WANG Tao, LIU Xin. 2009: Risk evaluation of geological hazards in Weibin District, Baoji City, Shaanxi Province, China. Geological Bulletin of China, 28(8): 1053-1063.
    XU Qiang, CHEN Wei. 2009: Risk assessment method for single rockfall geo-disaster: a case study on the rockfall in Danba County, Sichuan, China. Geological Bulletin of China, 28(8): 1039-1046.
    SHI Ju-song, SHI Ling, WU Shu-ren, WANG Tao. 2009: Difficulties and countermeasures in the practice of landslide risk assessment. Geological Bulletin of China, 28(8): 1020-1030.
    WU Shu-ren, SHI Ju-song, ZHANG Chun-shan, WANG Tao. 2009: Preliminary discussion on technical guideline for geohazard risk assessment. Geological Bulletin of China, 28(8): 995-1005.
    WANG Hua-bin, WU Shu-ren. 2008: Key theory and method of landslide hazard risk assessments. Geological Bulletin of China, 27(11): 1764-1770.
    WU Shu-ren, SHI Ju-song, WANG Tao. 2008: Sudden geohazard prediction and evaluation: an overview. Geological Bulletin of China. Geological Bulletin of China, 27(11): 1753-1763.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(20)

    1. 严辉. 福建省宁化县地质灾害分布规律与发育特征研究. 安徽建筑. 2025(01): 127-131 .
    2. 安全，李亮，邢愿，黄广才，韦瑾. 基于多源遥感数据的区域地质灾害风险评价——以贵州省纳雍鬃岭煤矿区为例. 贵州地质. 2024(01): 80-91 .
    3. 陈宾，魏娜，张联志，李颖懿，刘宁，屈添强. 基于斜坡单元灾害强度的滑坡灾害易损性评价——以湖南省湘乡市为例. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2024(02): 137-145 .
    4. 周夏飞，周胜森，徐翔宇，解明礼，徐泽升，曹国志，王鲲鹏. 长江上游地质灾害次生突发水污染风险分区研究. 中国环境科学. 2024(07): 3999-4008 .
    5. 刘前进，邓必荣，何文城. 基于时间与规模概率的地质灾害危险性研究. 南昌工程学院学报. 2024(04): 63-68 .
    6. 王华锋，陈洪海，贾琛，马龙，亓贞才，张晓飞，马建伟，张晔. 基于GIS分析的鲁中南低山丘陵区地质灾害风险评价. 山东国土资源. 2024(10): 66-72 .
    7. 武杨. 斜坡单元支持下赣西山区典型乡镇地质灾害风险评价. 地理空间信息. 2024(10): 117-120 .
    8. 林高聪，刘欢，王洪磊，潘书华. 不同比例尺度下的地质灾害风险评价分析——以湖南黄溪口镇为例. 中国地质调查. 2024(06): 100-110 .
    9. 袁维军，王亚明，邵兆伟. 韧性视角下国土空间灾害风险评估实证研究. 智能城市. 2023(01): 57-62 .
    10. 李彧磊，熊启华，龙婧，王芮琼，陈标典，曾嘉. 基于斜坡单元鄂西山区典型集镇地质灾害风险评价. 科学技术与工程. 2023(06): 2326-2338 .
    11. 井川，张秀娟. 生态环境保护区域的地质灾害气象风险预警系统. 能源与环保. 2023(04): 32-38 .
    12. 赵东旭，龙奇勇，彭军，柳翠明，李奇，陈可蕴. 多源地理时空数据辅助房屋建筑承灾体调查研究. 工程勘察. 2023(11): 69-73 .
    13. 尹飞. 基于差分进化算法的水工环地质灾害危险性评估方法研究. 环境科学与管理. 2023(12): 190-194 .
    14. 王守沛，高攀，咬登魁. 安徽省崩滑流地质灾害风险评价研究. 安徽地质. 2023(04): 289-291+335 .
    15. 张伟明，梁海滨，李琦，伍颖. 城镇燃气管网地震易损性评估指标体系研究. 煤气与热力. 2023(11): 1-12 .
    16. 许泰，鄂崇毅，蒋兴波，郜云峰，付利钊. 永登县苦水镇地质灾害风险性评价. 防灾科技学院学报. 2022(01): 42-53 .
    17. 黄丽达，邓青，陈建国. 国家安全系统风险评估研究. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版). 2022(02): 173-181 .
    18. 陈昊东. 甘肃省环县天池乡干沟不稳定斜坡地质灾害特征及治理研究. 资源信息与工程. 2022(03): 115-117 .
    19. 龚凌枫，徐伟，铁永波，卢佳燕，张玙，高延超. 基于数值模拟的城镇地质灾害危险性评价方法. 中国地质调查. 2022(04): 82-91 .
    20. 邹凤钗，邹银先，陶小郎，吕东. 基于GIS分析的万山区地质灾害风险评价. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(06): 117-124 .

    Other cited types(8)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1411) PDF downloads (583) Cited by(28)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    Related Articles

    Copyright © 2023 ditorial Department of Geological Bulletin of China

    Address：45 Fuwai Street, Xicheng District, Beijing China Geological Survey Development Research Center  Postal Code：100037

    Tel：010-58584206；010-58584208；010-58584208  Email：dzhtb@263.net

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return