• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库核心期刊
ZHANG Yue-qiao, DONG Shu-wen. 2008: Mesozoic tectonic evolution history of the Tan-Lu fault zone: Advances and new understanding. Geological Bulletin of China, 27(9): 1371-1390.
Citation: ZHANG Yue-qiao, DONG Shu-wen. 2008: Mesozoic tectonic evolution history of the Tan-Lu fault zone: Advances and new understanding. Geological Bulletin of China, 27(9): 1371-1390.

Mesozoic tectonic evolution history of the Tan-Lu fault zone: Advances and new understanding

More Information
  • The authors put forward a new chronological evolution model of the Mesozoic kinematic history of the Tan-Lu fault zone, which is boiled down to “two movement periods and five development stages”. The first movement period corresponds to the Triassic to earliest Early Jurassic “Indosinian Movement”, characterized by amalgamation between the North China Craton and the Yangtze block and collisional orogeny. During this movement period, the Tan-Lu fault zone experienced two stages, i.e. the first and second stages. The first stage (240-220 Ma) was a transition strike-slip stage, when the strike-slip movement of the fault zone was restricted to a transform zone between two ultra-high pressure (UHP) metamorphic belts. The Xu-Huai orocline on the western side of the Tan-Lu fault zone was formed by westward ductile extrusion of the Sulu UHP metamorphic belt as a consequence of the deep subduction of the Yangtze block beneath the North China Craton. The second stage (220-190 Ma) was a left-lateral strike-slip stage. During this stage, the Xu-Huai orocline was displaced southward about 145 km and then was absorbed an E-W-striking thrust system in the hinterland area of the Dabie orogenic belt. Northward propagation of the left-slip motion made the Tan-Lu fault zone go through the whole of North China and Northeast China. The second movement period corresponded to the Middle-Late Jurassic to Paleocene “Yanshan Movement”, and the tectonic history of the Tan-Lu fault zone was closely associated with the evolution of the active continental margin of East Asia. The fault zone during this movement period underwent three stages, i.e. the third, fourth and fifth stages. The third stage (Middle-Late Jurassic to earliest Early Cretaceous) witnessed compressive strike-slip motion, accompanied by the lithospheric and crustal thickening of the eastern North China Block and formation and development of the Tan-Lu fault system. The fourth stage (Early Cretaceous) saw crustal extension and intracontinental rifting, resulting in collapse and thinning of the thickened lithosphere of North China. During the fifth stage (Late Cretaceous to Paleocene), dextral strike-slip motion predominated and a number of pull-apart basins formed along and at both sides of the Tan-Lu fault zone. The paper systematically describes the Mesozoic development history and geological features of the Tan-Lu fault zone and its specific role played in the tectonic evolution of the East Asian continent.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(20)

    1. 严辉. 福建省宁化县地质灾害分布规律与发育特征研究. 安徽建筑. 2025(01): 127-131 .
    2. 安全,李亮,邢愿,黄广才,韦瑾. 基于多源遥感数据的区域地质灾害风险评价——以贵州省纳雍鬃岭煤矿区为例. 贵州地质. 2024(01): 80-91 .
    3. 陈宾,魏娜,张联志,李颖懿,刘宁,屈添强. 基于斜坡单元灾害强度的滑坡灾害易损性评价——以湖南省湘乡市为例. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2024(02): 137-145 .
    4. 周夏飞,周胜森,徐翔宇,解明礼,徐泽升,曹国志,王鲲鹏. 长江上游地质灾害次生突发水污染风险分区研究. 中国环境科学. 2024(07): 3999-4008 .
    5. 刘前进,邓必荣,何文城. 基于时间与规模概率的地质灾害危险性研究. 南昌工程学院学报. 2024(04): 63-68 .
    6. 王华锋,陈洪海,贾琛,马龙,亓贞才,张晓飞,马建伟,张晔. 基于GIS分析的鲁中南低山丘陵区地质灾害风险评价. 山东国土资源. 2024(10): 66-72 .
    7. 武杨. 斜坡单元支持下赣西山区典型乡镇地质灾害风险评价. 地理空间信息. 2024(10): 117-120 .
    8. 林高聪,刘欢,王洪磊,潘书华. 不同比例尺度下的地质灾害风险评价分析——以湖南黄溪口镇为例. 中国地质调查. 2024(06): 100-110 .
    9. 袁维军,王亚明,邵兆伟. 韧性视角下国土空间灾害风险评估实证研究. 智能城市. 2023(01): 57-62 .
    10. 李彧磊,熊启华,龙婧,王芮琼,陈标典,曾嘉. 基于斜坡单元鄂西山区典型集镇地质灾害风险评价. 科学技术与工程. 2023(06): 2326-2338 .
    11. 井川,张秀娟. 生态环境保护区域的地质灾害气象风险预警系统. 能源与环保. 2023(04): 32-38 .
    12. 赵东旭,龙奇勇,彭军,柳翠明,李奇,陈可蕴. 多源地理时空数据辅助房屋建筑承灾体调查研究. 工程勘察. 2023(11): 69-73 .
    13. 尹飞. 基于差分进化算法的水工环地质灾害危险性评估方法研究. 环境科学与管理. 2023(12): 190-194 .
    14. 王守沛,高攀,咬登魁. 安徽省崩滑流地质灾害风险评价研究. 安徽地质. 2023(04): 289-291+335 .
    15. 张伟明,梁海滨,李琦,伍颖. 城镇燃气管网地震易损性评估指标体系研究. 煤气与热力. 2023(11): 1-12 .
    16. 许泰,鄂崇毅,蒋兴波,郜云峰,付利钊. 永登县苦水镇地质灾害风险性评价. 防灾科技学院学报. 2022(01): 42-53 .
    17. 黄丽达,邓青,陈建国. 国家安全系统风险评估研究. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版). 2022(02): 173-181 .
    18. 陈昊东. 甘肃省环县天池乡干沟不稳定斜坡地质灾害特征及治理研究. 资源信息与工程. 2022(03): 115-117 .
    19. 龚凌枫,徐伟,铁永波,卢佳燕,张玙,高延超. 基于数值模拟的城镇地质灾害危险性评价方法. 中国地质调查. 2022(04): 82-91 .
    20. 邹凤钗,邹银先,陶小郎,吕东. 基于GIS分析的万山区地质灾害风险评价. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(06): 117-124 .

    Other cited types(8)

Catalog

    Article views (5609) PDF downloads (3412) Cited by(28)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return