• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库核心期刊

江西赣州地区土壤-水稻系统重金属含量特征及健康风险评价

周墨, 唐志敏, 张明, 梁晓红, 湛龙

周墨, 唐志敏, 张明, 梁晓红, 湛龙. 2021: 江西赣州地区土壤-水稻系统重金属含量特征及健康风险评价. 地质通报, 40(12): 2149-2158.
引用本文: 周墨, 唐志敏, 张明, 梁晓红, 湛龙. 2021: 江西赣州地区土壤-水稻系统重金属含量特征及健康风险评价. 地质通报, 40(12): 2149-2158.
ZHOU Mo, TANG Zhimin, ZHANG Ming, LIANG Xiaohong, ZHAN Long. 2021: Characteristics and health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil-rice system in the Ganzhou area, Jiangxi Province. Geological Bulletin of China, 40(12): 2149-2158.
Citation: ZHOU Mo, TANG Zhimin, ZHANG Ming, LIANG Xiaohong, ZHAN Long. 2021: Characteristics and health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil-rice system in the Ganzhou area, Jiangxi Province. Geological Bulletin of China, 40(12): 2149-2158.

江西赣州地区土壤-水稻系统重金属含量特征及健康风险评价

基金项目: 

中国地质调查局项目《全国土地质量地球化学调查成果集成与服用应用(南京地质调查中心)》 DD20190519

《华东地区自然资源综合调查》 DD20211384

详细信息
    作者简介:

    周墨(1989-), 男, 硕士, 工程师, 地球化学专业, 从事生态地球化学研究。E-mail: zhoumo407@126.com

  • 中图分类号: P595;S15

Characteristics and health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil-rice system in the Ganzhou area, Jiangxi Province

  • 摘要:

    为研究江西省赣州市主要耕作区土壤-水稻系统中重金属的含量及人体健康风险,系统采集了赣州市主要耕作区水稻及根系土样品954组,分析了水稻籽实和根系土中Cd、Cr、Hg和Pb的含量及根系土pH值,利用美国环保署(USEPA)推荐的健康风险评估模型进行健康风险评价。研究表明:随着土壤pH值升高,水稻籽实中各重金属元素超标率逐渐降低,其中Cd是土壤和水稻中最主要的污染元素;在土壤-水稻系统中,Cd的迁移能力和土壤pH值是决定水稻籽实重金属是否超标的主要因素。健康风险评价结果显示,研究区重金属总非致癌风险指数HI < 1,说明几乎不存在由食用水稻得慢性疾病的风险。致癌健康风险值为7.10×10-3,Cd是最主要的致癌风险因子,Cr和Pb致癌风险属于可接受范围。基于行政单元的人体健康风险区划表明,上犹县、兴国县和南康区存在一定的风险,虽然重金属没有出现显著超标,但是有关部门应对水稻及根系土中Cd元素含量予以重视,将Cd元素作为赣州市土壤重金属污染防控工作中优先控制的重金属。

    Abstract:

    Total 954 pairs of rice grain and soil samples were collected to investigate the distribution of heavy metals in the soil-rice system and their human health risk in Ganzhou City.The contents of Cd, Cr, Hg and Pb in rice seeds and root soil and the pH value of root soil were analyzed, and the health risk assessment model derived by USEPA was used to evaluate health risk caused by heavy metals.The results show that exceedance rate of heavy metals in rice decreases with the increase of soil pH; Cd is the most severely contaminated metal; and migration ability of Cd and soil pH value are the main factors that determined whether heavy metals in rice grains exceed the standard.The results of health risk assessment show that the total non-carcinogenic risk index(HI) of heavy metals is less than 1, indicating that there is almost no risk of chronic diseases from ingesting rice.The carcinogenic health risk value is 7.10×10-3; Cd is the most important carcinogenic risk factor; and Cr and Pb carcinogenic risk is within the acceptable range.According to the human health risk zoning, there are risks in Shangyou, Xingguo and Nankang, which is worth paying more attention.Although heavy metals do not exceed the standard significantly, the relevant authorities should take exceedance of Cd seriously, and should take Cd as the priority in the prevention and control of heavy metal pollution in the soil of Ganzhou City.

  • 致谢: 感谢项目组所有成员对本项目工作的付出,感谢审稿专家提出的宝贵意见。
  • 图  1   研究区采样点位分布图

    Figure  1.   Distribution of sampling location in the study area

    图  2   研究区土壤中重金属元素含量和pH值分级图

    Figure  2.   Metal concentrations in paddy soil and soil pH grading of different study area

    图  3   土壤-水稻系统中Cd富集系数和超标情况与土壤pH值关系

    Figure  3.   Relationship of Cd enrichment coefficient in paddy soil-rice system with pH

    图  4   研究区水稻籽实中重金属元素含量分级图

    Figure  4.   Heavy metal concentration grading of rice grains in different study area

    图  5   赣州市不同地区重金属元素富集系数示意图

    Figure  5.   Enrichment coefficient of heavy metals in different areas of Ganzhou City

    图  6   土壤-水稻系统中重金属元素富集系数与土壤pH值关系

    Figure  6.   Relationship of heavy metal enrichment coefficient in paddy soil-rice system with pH

    图  7   赣州市不同地区非致癌风险和致癌健康风险

    Figure  7.   Non-carcinogenic risks and carcinogenic health risks in different areas of Ganzhou City

    表  1   指标的分析方法及检出限

    Table  1   The analysis method and detection limit of the index

    类型 元素 分析方法 检出限 类型 元素 分析方法 检出限
    Cd ICP-MS 0.03 Cd ICP-MS 0.03
    Hg AFS 0.0005 Hg AFS 0.005
    土壤 Cr ICP-MS 5 水稻籽实 Cr ICP-MS 0.5
    Pb XRF 2 Pb XRF 0.1
    pH ISE 0.1**
    注:“ ** ”为无量纲,其他元素单位为mg/kg;AFS—原子荧光光谱法;ICP-MS—等离子体质谱法;XRF—X射线荧光光谱法;ISE—离子选择性电极法
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   土壤中重金属元素含量特征

    Table  2   Descriptive basic statistics of metal concentrations in paddy soil

    元素 算术平均值 最小值 最大值 标准偏差 CV/% 中国土壤背景值[21] 评价标准
    pH≤5 5.5<pH≤6.5 6.5<pH≤7.5 pH>7.5
    Cd 0.194 0.004 4.040 0.21 106.47 0.097 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.5
    Cr 53.20 7.92 269.00 25.10 47.18 61 250 250 300 350
    Hg 0.12 0.01 1.19 0.08 66.94 0.065 0.5 0.5 0.6 1
    Pb 44.36 8.10 335.50 25.22 56.86 26 80 100 140 240
    pH 5.32 4.30 7.95 0.49 9.13 6.7
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   水稻籽实中各重金属元素含量

    Table  3   Statistics of metal concentrations in rice grains  mg/kg

    元素 Cd Cr Hg Pb
    平均值 0.079 0.297 0.006 0.058
    最小值 0.002 0.080 0.0002 0.005
    最大值 1.660 3.470 0.316 0.860
    标准偏差 0.12 0.33 0.01 0.06
    CV/% 155.33 112.43 228.25 98.20
    最高允许界限值 0.2 1.0 0.02 0.2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   土壤重金属对人体的日摄入量、非致癌风险和致癌健康风险

    Table  4   Daily intake, non-carcinogenic risk and carcinogenic health risk of soil heavy metals

    非致癌风险指数 致癌风险指数
    元素 范围 平均值 元素 范围 平均值
    HQ-Cd 0.010623~ 8.817490 0.420475 RISK-Cd 0.16×10-3~ 1.32×10-1 6.31×10-3
    HQ-Cr 0.000283~ 0.012289 0.00105 RISK-Cr 2.12×10-4~ 9.22×10-3 7.89×10-4
    HQ-Hg 0.003541~ 5.595034 0.109075 RISK-Hg - -
    HQ-Pb 0.006082~ 1.142024 0.076431 RISK-Pb 2.07×10-7~ 3.88×10-6 2.60×10-6
    HI 0.056648~ 8.938562 0.060703 TRISK 4.75×10-4~ 1.34×10-1 7.10×10-3
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 张迪, 周明忠, 熊康宁, 等. 遵义松林Ni-Mo矿区土壤Cu、Zn污染及农作物健康风险评价[J]. 地球与环境, 2018, 46(6): 581-589. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDQ201806010.htm
    高健翁, 龚晶晶, 杨剑洲, 等. 海南岛琼中黎母山-湾岭地区土壤重金属元素分布特征及生态风险评价[J]. 地质通报, 2021, 40(5): 807-816. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20210515&flag=1

    Gu Q, Yang Z, Yu T, et al. From soil to rice-a typical study of transfer and bioaccumulation of heavy metals in China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science, 2018, 68(7): 631-642. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000040333037610_a5ba.html

    Guan X, Sun L N. Current situation and the harm of soil heavy metal pollution and food safety[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 675/677: 612-614. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.675-677.612

    郄海满, 文帮勇, 王继强, 等. 江西赣州梓山地区富硒土壤重金属元素安全性评价[J]. 华东地质, 2017, 38(3): 234-240. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HSDZ201703011.htm
    徐友宁, 张江华, 柯海玲, 等. 某金矿区农田土壤重金属污染的人体健康风险[J]. 地质通报, 2014, 33(8): 1239-1252. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2014.08.020
    文帮勇, 黄锦, 张涛亮, 等. 赣南大余地区农田土壤As、Cd元素化学形态含量分析[J]. 华东地质, 2015, 36(4): 298-305. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HSDZ201504010.htm

    Farrow E M, Wang J M, Burken J G, et al. Reducing arsenic accumulation in rice grain through iron oxide amendment[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2015, 118: 55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.04.014

    齐雁冰, 黄标, 杨玉峰, 等. 苏州市不同区域水稻籽实重金属积累特征与健康风险评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(4): 659-665. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NHBH201004012.htm
    王运, 邹勇军, 王鹤, 等. 江西信丰油山地区土壤硒及重金属元素地球化学特征[J]. 华东地质, 2019, 40(2): 152-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HSDZ201902009.htm

    Moon C S, Zhang Z W, Shimbo S, et al. Dietary intake of cadmium and lead among the general population in Korea[J]. Environmental Research, 1995, 71(1): 46-54. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1995.1066

    US EPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume Ⅰ: Human Health Evaluation Manual Supplemental Guidance[M]. Washington DC, 1989.

    US EPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume Ⅲ-Part A, Process for Conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment[M]. Washington DC, 2001.

    US EPA. Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites[M]. Washington, DC, 2002.

    US EPA, Exposure Factors Handbook(2011 edition)[M]. Washington, DC, 2011.

    薛强, 赵元艺, 张佳文, 等. 基于农作物食用安全的土壤重金属风险阈值[J]. 地质通报, 2014, 33(8): 1132-1139. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2014.08.006

    Gu Q B, Yu T, Yang Z F, et al. Prediction and risk assessment of five heavy metals in maize and peanut: A case study of Guangxi, China[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2019, 70: 103199. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2019.103199

    Mao C P, Song Y X, Chen L X, et al. Human health risks of heavy metals in paddy rice based on transfer characteristics of heavy metals from soil to rice[J]. Catena, 2019, 175: 339-348. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.029

    USEPA. Integrated Risk Information System(IRIS)[DB/OL]. Washington, DC, USA. https://www.epa.gov/iris, 2016.

    宗庆霞, 窦磊, 侯青叶, 等. 基于土地利用类型的土壤重金属区域生态风险评价: 以珠江三角洲经济区为例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(8): 875-884. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201708012.htm
    中国环境监测总站. 中国土壤元素背景值[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1990.
    宋波, 王佛鹏, 周浪, 等. 广西高镉异常区水田土壤Cd含量特征及生态风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(5): 2443-2452. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJKZ201905053.htm
    王锐, 胡小兰, 张永文, 等. 重庆市主要农耕区土壤Cd生物有效性及影响因素[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(4): 355-361. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJKZ202004045.htm
    敖明, 柴冠群, 刘桂华, 等. 水稻对镉的吸收与转运规律研究进展[J]. 南方农业, 2018, 12(24): 127-128, 131. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFNY201824069.htm

    Hu W Y, Chen Y, Huang B, et al. Health risk assessment of heavy metals in soils and vegetables from a typical greenhouse vegetable production system in China[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 2014, 20: 1264-1280. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2013.831267

    Zheng N, Wang Q, Zheng D M. Health risk of Hg, Pb, Cd, Zn, and Cu to theinhabitants around Huludao Zinc Plant in China via consumption of vegetables[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2007, 383(1/3): 81-89. http://qnnkxjj.cast.org.cn/uploadfile/jiangxiang/2015Aug17/1439790819750.pdf

    中华人民共和国国土资源部. 中国人民共和国地质矿产行业标准多目标区域地球化学调查规范(1: 250000) (DZ /T0258—2014). 2014.
    中国地质调查局. 中国地质调查局地质调查技术标准生态地球化学评价样品分析技术要求(试行) (DD2005—03). 2005.
    生态环保部中华人民共和国国家市场监督管理总局. 土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行) (GB 15618—2018). 2018.
    中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中污染物限量(GB 2762—2017). 2017.
图(7)  /  表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-05-31
  • 修回日期:  2020-10-25
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-08-15
  • 刊出日期:  2021-12-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回