• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库核心期刊

内蒙古北山造山带小红山地区三叠纪花岗岩成因—来自锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素的约束

李敏, 任邦方, 段霄龙, 田健, 段连峰, 牛文超

李敏, 任邦方, 段霄龙, 田健, 段连峰, 牛文超. 2020: 内蒙古北山造山带小红山地区三叠纪花岗岩成因—来自锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素的约束. 地质通报, 39(9): 1422-1435.
引用本文: 李敏, 任邦方, 段霄龙, 田健, 段连峰, 牛文超. 2020: 内蒙古北山造山带小红山地区三叠纪花岗岩成因—来自锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素的约束. 地质通报, 39(9): 1422-1435.
LI Min, REN Bangfang, DUAN Xiaolong, TIAN Jian, DUAN Lianfeng, NIU Wenchao. 2020: Petrogenesis of Triassic granites in Xiaohongshan area, Beishan orogenic belt: Constraints from zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes. Geological Bulletin of China, 39(9): 1422-1435.
Citation: LI Min, REN Bangfang, DUAN Xiaolong, TIAN Jian, DUAN Lianfeng, NIU Wenchao. 2020: Petrogenesis of Triassic granites in Xiaohongshan area, Beishan orogenic belt: Constraints from zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes. Geological Bulletin of China, 39(9): 1422-1435.

内蒙古北山造山带小红山地区三叠纪花岗岩成因—来自锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素的约束

基金项目: 

中国地质调查局项目《全国陆域及海区地质图件更新与共享(中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心)》 DD20190371

《温都尔庙和镶黄旗地区区域地质调查》 DD20190038

《阴山成矿带小狐狸山和雅布赖地区区域地质矿产调查》 DD20160039

详细信息
    作者简介:

    李敏(1986-), 男, 硕士, 工程师, 从事岩石地球化学和岩石大地构造研究。E-mail:limin_2447@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    任邦方(1981-), 男, 高级工程师, 从事基础地质和地球化学研究。E-mail:23907729@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: P534.51;P588.12+1

Petrogenesis of Triassic granites in Xiaohongshan area, Beishan orogenic belt: Constraints from zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes

  • 摘要:

    对北山造山带小红山地区三叠纪花岗斑岩锆石U-Pb年龄、锆石Hf同位素和全岩地球化学组成进行了研究。LA-MC-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb测年结果显示,2个花岗斑岩样品的锆石206Pb/238U年龄为211.8±1.6 Ma和205.9±1.7 Ma,显示花岗斑岩的侵位时代为晚三叠世晚期。花岗斑岩具有高硅、富碱、准铝,贫钙、镁、铁的特征,属于高钾钙碱性至钾玄岩系列,分异程度较高,属高分异Ⅰ型花岗岩,富集Rb、Th、U、La、Ce等大离子亲石元素,亏损Nb、P、Ti等高场强元素和Ba、Sr,表现出低Sr,高Yb和Y的特点,并具有明显的负Eu异常。εHft)值较高(-1.43~9.93),Hf同位素地壳模式年龄TDMC为610~1335 Ma,指示花岗斑岩均源于具有幔源烙印的新生地壳并混有重熔的古老地壳。结合最近获得的数据及区域地质资料,提出在后造山伸展体制下,基性岩浆底侵带来的热导致新元古代—古生代新生地壳的部分熔融,并遭受了下元古界古老地壳重熔的岩浆混染,形成的岩浆经过分离结晶作用,最终在中上地壳侵位形成了晚三叠世花岗斑岩。

    Abstract:

    In this paper, zircon U-Pb ages, Hf isotopes and whole rock geochemical compositions of Triassic granite-porphyry in Xiaohongshan area of Beishan orogenic belt were systematically studied.Zircon LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb dating results show that the two ages of granite-porphyry are 211.8±1.6 Ma(the confidence value is 95%, n=24, MSDW=2.4)and 205.9±1.7 Ma(the confidence value is 95%, n=23, MSDW=2.9)respectively, which intruded at the late stage of Late Triassic.The granite-porphyry in the study area is characterized by high silicon, rich alkali, quasi-aluminum, and poor calcium, magnesium, and iron.It belongs to the series of high potassium calc-alkaline to potassic basanite with high degree of differentiation.It belongs to highly differentiated Ⅰ-type granite.It is enriched in Rb, Th, U, La, Ce and other large ion lithophile elements and depleted in Nb, P, Ti, Ba and Sr. It is characterized by low Sr, high Yb and Y with obvious negative europium anomaly.The εHf(t)values range from -1.43 to 9.93, which are relatively high, and the Hf isotopic crustal model ages range from 610 Ma to 1335 Ma, indicating that the granite-porphyry was derived from the juvenile crust with mantle imprint mixed with remelting old crust. According to the data obtained in this paper and other regional geological data acquired recently, it is proposed that, under the post-orogenic extension system, the heat brought by the underplating of basic magma caused the partial melting of the juvenile crust from Neoproterozoic to Paleozoic, and suffered magma contamination of the remelting of the old crust of Lower Proterozoic.In addition, the magma was finally emplaced in the middle and upper crust after fractional crystallization, forming the the Late Triassic granite-porphyry in the study area.

  • 致谢: 野外工作得到中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心赵泽霖、张国震和程先钰的帮助和支持,审稿专家提出了中肯的修改建议,在此一并表示感谢。
  • 图  1   北山造山带小红山地区地质简图

    Figure  1.   Geological sketch map of Xiaohongshan area in Beishan orogenic belt

    图  2   小红山地区花岗斑岩野外(a)与镜下照片(b)

    Q—石英;Kf—钾长石

    Figure  2.   Field photo(a) and micrograph(b) of the granite-porphyry in Xiaohongshan area

    图  3   小红山地区花岗斑岩锆石阴极发光(CL)图像及206Pb/238U年龄

    (实线圈为U-Pb测点,虚线圈为Hf同位素测点)

    Figure  3.   CL images and 206Pb/238U ages of zircons for the granite-porphyry in Xiaohongshan area

    图  4   小红山地区花岗斑岩样品TW730a(a)和TW730b(b)锆石U-Pb谐和图

    Figure  4.   Zircons U-Pb concordia diagrams of the granite-porphyry TW730(a) and TW730b(b) in Xiaohongshan area

    图  5   小红山地区花岗斑岩主量元素图解

    (a中:Q’=Q×100/(Q+Or+Ab+An), ANOR=An×100/(Or+ An))
    IAG—岛弧花岗岩类;CAG—大陆弧花岗岩类;CCG—大陆碰撞花岗岩类;POG—后造山花岗岩类;RRG—与裂谷有关的花岗岩类

    Figure  5.   Major element diagrams of the granite-porphyry in Xiaohongshan area

    图  6   小红山地区花岗斑岩稀土元素球粒陨石标准化配分模式图(a)和微量元素原始地幔标准化蛛网图(b)

    Figure  6.   Chondrite-normalized rare earth element patterns(a)and primitive mantle-normalized trace elemets spider diagrams(b)of the granite-porphyry in Xiaohongshan area

    图  7   小红山地区花岗斑岩锆石206Pb/238U年龄-176Hf/177Hf(a)和206Pb/238U年龄-εHf(t)(b)图解

    Figure  7.   206Pb/238U age-176Hf/177Hf(a) and 206Pb/238U age-εHf(t)(b) diagrams of the granite-porphyry in Xiaohongshan area

    图  8   小红山地区花岗斑岩成因类型判别图解

    Ⅰ、S、A—Ⅰ型、S型、A型花岗岩;OGT—未分异的Ⅰ、S型花岗岩区;FG—分异的Ⅰ型花岗岩区

    Figure  8.   Various chemical discrimination diagrams for the granite-porphyry in Xiaohongshan area

    图  9   小红山地区花岗斑岩LaN-(La/Yb)N(a)、δEu-Sr(b)、Sr-Rb(c)、Sr-Ba(d)、Zr-TiO2(e)和Ni-Cr(f)关系图及分离结晶趋势

    Zr—锆石;Ap—磷灰石;Mon—独居石;Allan—褐帘石;PlAn15—斜长石(An=15);PlAn50—斜长石(An=50);Pl—斜长石;Kf—钾长石;Bi—黑云母;Ms—白云母;Amp—角闪石;Hb—角闪石;Grt—石榴子石;Mgt—磁铁矿;Tit—榍石;Cpx—单斜辉石

    Figure  9.   LaN-(La/Yb)N(a), δEu-Sr(b), Sr-Rb(c), Sr-Ba(d), Zr-TiO2(e) and Ni-Cr(f)diagrams showing the fractional crystallization trends for the granite-porphyry in Xiaohongshan area

    表  1   小红山地区花岗斑岩LA-MC-ICP-MS锆石U-Th-Pb同位素数据表

    Table  1   Zircon LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Th-Pb dating result of the granite-porphyry in Xiaohongshan area

    样品号 含量/10-6 同位素比值 年龄/Ma
    Pb U 206Pb/238U 207Pb/235U 207Pb/206Pb 208Pb/232Th 232Th/238U 206Pb/238U 207Pb/235U 207Pb/206Pb
    TW730a
    1 9 188 0.0320 0.0004 0.2261 0.0070 0.0513 0.0012 0.0161 0.0005 1.4923 0.013 202.8 2.6 207 6 255 54
    2 34 907 0.0331 0.0005 0.2277 0.0076 0.0499 0.0011 0.0107 0.0002 0.8336 0.026 209.9 3.5 208 7 191 51
    3 15 352 0.0342 0.0003 0.2370 0.0055 0.0503 0.0011 0.0105 0.0002 1.2178 0.003 216.6 2.2 216 5 210 51
    4 46 1294 0.0340 0.0004 0.2312 0.0036 0.0493 0.0007 0.0096 0.0002 0.5697 0.003 215.4 2.2 211 3 164 31
    5 25 710 0.0336 0.0004 0.2365 0.0040 0.0510 0.0008 0.0096 0.0002 0.6125 0.007 213.2 2.5 216 4 241 34
    6 126 3287 0.0327 0.0004 0.2288 0.0036 0.0508 0.0007 0.0114 0.0004 0.8537 0.018 207.2 2.5 209 3 232 34
    7 20 459 0.0326 0.0003 0.2320 0.0044 0.0517 0.0008 0.0167 0.0004 0.8994 0.015 206.6 2.2 212 4 270 36
    8 14 413 0.0338 0.0004 0.2375 0.0046 0.0510 0.0009 0.0104 0.0002 0.4067 0.004 214.2 2.4 216 4 240 38
    9 74 2012 0.0332 0.0005 0.2356 0.0036 0.0514 0.0006 0.0119 0.0002 0.6266 0.003 210.6 3.0 215 3 260 28
    10 185 5542 0.0338 0.0003 0.2325 0.0031 0.0499 0.0006 0.0153 0.0003 0.2024 0.000 214.5 2.1 212 3 188 27
    11 23 539 0.0325 0.0004 0.2268 0.0059 0.0506 0.0010 0.0104 0.0002 1.5112 0.026 206.1 2.7 208 5 224 44
    12 30 762 0.0339 0.0004 0.2367 0.0036 0.0507 0.0007 0.0076 0.0002 1.3465 0.031 214.7 2.7 216 3 227 32
    13 373 10106 0.0329 0.0004 0.2289 0.0074 0.0504 0.0013 0.0097 0.0003 0.8127 0.004 209.0 2.7 209 7 213 58
    14 45 1136 0.0337 0.0004 0.2354 0.0034 0.0507 0.0006 0.0109 0.0002 0.9680 0.007 213.5 2.4 215 3 227 29
    15 84 2402 0.0341 0.0004 0.2333 0.0031 0.0496 0.0006 0.0104 0.0002 0.4158 0.001 216.4 2.3 213 3 174 30
    16 12 351 0.0336 0.0004 0.2358 0.0046 0.0509 0.0009 0.0104 0.0003 0.3604 0.001 213.1 2.3 215 4 235 41
    17 71 1950 0.0336 0.0005 0.2362 0.0032 0.0510 0.0007 0.0175 0.0004 0.3685 0.006 212.9 2.9 215 3 241 33
    18 38 1104 0.0336 0.0004 0.2387 0.0034 0.0515 0.0007 0.0102 0.0002 0.4598 0.004 213.1 2.3 217 3 264 29
    19 162 4089 0.0323 0.0005 0.2222 0.0078 0.0500 0.0012 0.0297 0.0007 0.4002 0.013 204.7 3.4 204 7 193 54
    20 7 203 0.0341 0.0004 0.2350 0.0108 0.0500 0.0021 0.0115 0.0003 0.5562 0.007 215.9 2.7 214 10 197 100
    21 85 2321 0.0334 0.0004 0.2319 0.0047 0.0503 0.0008 0.0130 0.0003 0.5382 0.007 211.9 2.3 212 4 210 37
    22 44 1262 0.0335 0.0003 0.2380 0.0033 0.0515 0.0006 0.0102 0.0002 0.4742 0.002 212.5 2.2 217 3 264 28
    23 137 3624 0.0327 0.0003 0.2243 0.0031 0.0498 0.0006 0.0142 0.0003 0.6596 0.011 207.3 2.1 205 3 184 27
    24 258 7808 0.0337 0.0003 0.2377 0.0032 0.0512 0.0006 0.0097 0.0002 0.2790 0.003 213.7 2.2 217 3 248 27
    TW730b
    1 10 254 0.0334 0.0004 0.2334 0.0104 0.0507 0.0022 0.0097 0.0005 0.8374 0.010 211.7 2.7 213 9 227 102
    2 6 159 0.0335 0.0004 0.2305 0.0085 0.0499 0.0017 0.0093 0.0002 0.7434 0.006 212.4 2.4 211 8 191 81
    3 25 723 0.0330 0.0003 0.2321 0.0034 0.0511 0.0007 0.0094 0.0002 0.5787 0.002 209.1 2.1 212 3 243 30
    4 21 568 0.0334 0.0004 0.2301 0.0044 0.0499 0.0008 0.0103 0.0002 0.7694 0.006 211.9 2.4 210 4 191 39
    5 14 408 0.0316 0.0003 0.2343 0.0067 0.0537 0.0015 0.0073 0.0002 0.9380 0.004 200.6 2.0 214 6 360 63
    6 18 644 0.0236 0.0002 0.2485 0.0036 0.0763 0.0010 0.0088 0.0002 0.7061 0.008 150.5 1.5 225 3 1103 26
    7 48 1377 0.0321 0.0003 0.2305 0.0034 0.0521 0.0007 0.0097 0.0002 0.6871 0.004 203.6 2.0 211 3 289 31
    8 46 1104 0.0311 0.0003 0.2244 0.0034 0.0523 0.0007 0.0171 0.0004 0.9075 0.002 197.6 2.0 206 3 299 33
    9 6 178 0.0330 0.0004 0.2328 0.0109 0.0512 0.0023 0.0100 0.0002 0.6029 0.009 209.1 2.4 213 10 251 106
    10 15 384 0.0333 0.0008 0.2283 0.0074 0.0498 0.0011 0.0150 0.0004 0.6090 0.023 211.0 5.1 209 7 185 50
    11 6 155 0.0326 0.0004 0.2314 0.0107 0.0515 0.0023 0.0109 0.0003 0.8014 0.009 206.8 2.7 211 10 263 101
    12 2 64 0.0325 0.0005 0.2277 0.0216 0.0508 0.0048 0.0090 0.0003 1.0395 0.016 206.5 2.9 208 20 230 218
    13 9 255 0.0326 0.0004 0.2245 0.0071 0.0500 0.0015 0.0108 0.0002 0.6784 0.003 206.7 2.3 206 6 194 69
    14 9 264 0.0326 0.0003 0.2303 0.0062 0.0512 0.0013 0.0113 0.0003 0.5415 0.008 207.1 2.2 210 6 249 59
    15 15 440 0.0319 0.0003 0.2224 0.0036 0.0506 0.0007 0.0115 0.0003 0.6077 0.003 202.4 2.1 204 3 221 34
    16 11 307 0.0321 0.0003 0.2273 0.0046 0.0514 0.0009 0.0123 0.0003 0.6260 0.004 203.6 2.1 208 4 258 42
    17 5 132 0.0319 0.0003 0.2245 0.0089 0.0511 0.0020 0.0112 0.0003 0.8566 0.003 202.4 2.1 206 8 243 91
    18 6 130 0.0328 0.0004 0.2248 0.0071 0.0497 0.0015 0.0152 0.0003 0.9640 0.005 207.9 2.3 206 6 183 71
    19 15 436 0.0319 0.0003 0.2252 0.0038 0.0512 0.0008 0.0115 0.0002 0.5955 0.003 202.4 2.0 206 3 250 36
    20 12 319 0.0327 0.0003 0.2299 0.0048 0.0510 0.0010 0.0123 0.0003 0.6949 0.003 207.3 2.2 210 4 242 45
    21 9 236 0.0326 0.0003 0.2292 0.0061 0.0510 0.0013 0.0124 0.0003 0.6929 0.003 206.7 2.1 210 6 242 59
    22 22 583 0.0326 0.0003 0.2210 0.0038 0.0492 0.0008 0.0128 0.0003 0.7479 0.011 206.7 2.1 203 4 157 39
    23 15 350 0.0328 0.0003 0.2276 0.0046 0.0503 0.0009 0.0101 0.0002 1.5071 0.007 208.0 2.2 208 4 210 43
    24 14 386 0.0327 0.0003 0.2258 0.0051 0.0500 0.0011 0.0139 0.0004 0.6345 0.008 207.6 2.2 207 5 197 52
    注:测试单位为天津地质调查中心实验室
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   小红山地区花岗斑岩主量、微量和稀土元素测试结果

    Table  2   Major, trace elements and REE compositions of the granite-porphyry in Xiaohongshan area

    样号 YQ730.a YQ730.b YQ730.c YQ730.d YQ730.e YQ730.f YQ730.g YQ730.h
    SiO2 76.38 76.27 76.34 76.18 75.82 75.71 75.59 75.99
    Al2O3 12.40 12.49 12.45 12.46 12.31 12.35 12.51 12.31
    Fe2O3 0.36 0.46 0.49 0.64 0.67 0.72 0.62 0.85
    FeO 0.57 0.39 0.49 0.42 0.62 0.55 0.67 0.46
    CaO 0.70 0.66 0.67 0.69 0.76 0.82 0.66 0.68
    MgO 0.14 0.11 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.18
    K2O 4.76 4.94 4.49 4.86 5.33 5.42 5.44 5.38
    Na2O 3.67 3.66 3.86 3.58 3.01 2.96 3.01 2.87
    TiO2 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.16 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14
    P2O5 0.015 0.015 0.021 0.024 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.018
    MnO 0.045 0.037 0.03 0.04 0.055 0.048 0.052 0.049
    灼失量 0.78 0.80 0.83 0.75 1.07 1.07 1.06 1.03
    Pb 41.2 42.1 46.7 42.4 63.2 45.4 59.8 53.3
    Cr 1.68 1.22 1.45 0.87 1.37 1.32 1.13 1.65
    Ni 0.81 0.41 0.69 0.44 0.5 0.63 0.49 0.58
    Co 0.58 0.46 0.54 0.58 0.68 0.60 0.69 0.73
    Rb 952 987 902 984 790 779 801 808
    Cs 6.18 6.31 6.27 6.79 7.24 7.65 7.45 7.77
    Sr 21.5 23.6 24.4 29.6 34.2 34.1 37.5 58.0
    Ba 47.8 77.8 67.9 95.4 93.1 95.0 108 104
    V 2.95 2.68 3.85 4.20 3.82 4.72 4.81 4.73
    Sc 4.56 4.76 4.66 4.82 4.74 4.75 4.79 4.91
    Nb 52.9 52.6 45.0 51.8 29.7 29.3 30.0 30.4
    Ta 6.67 6.61 5.96 6.12 4.22 4.19 4.18 4.24
    Zr 218 157 142 142 155 155 148 148
    Hf 10.7 7.41 6.23 5.51 7.20 7.12 7.06 7.13
    Ga 10.1 10.5 10.6 11.4 10.9 12.4 11.9 12.1
    U 40.1 40.0 26.9 35.6 10.4 10.2 15.5 15.7
    Th 75.0 58.0 51.3 54.6 57.5 54.9 58.5 63.6
    La 24.5 23.0 24.4 31.2 38.3 36.5 42.1 45.0
    Ce 43.0 40.0 41.6 52.1 57.8 51.7 64.4 114
    Pr 6.64 6.12 6.43 8.20 8.63 8.16 9.51 10.5
    Nd 24.4 22.5 23.1 29.6 28.0 26.9 31.6 34.6
    Sm 5.89 5.37 5.40 6.86 5.32 5.05 5.87 6.76
    Eu 0.30 0.32 0.30 0.41 0.27 0.26 0.31 0.33
    Gd 5.76 5.22 5.20 6.56 5.10 4.86 5.58 6.35
    Tb 1.24 1.12 1.05 1.34 0.93 0.90 1.00 1.13
    Dy 8.21 7.40 6.72 8.52 5.67 5.73 6.12 6.98
    Ho 1.74 1.55 1.41 1.76 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.46
    Er 5.57 4.79 4.45 5.44 3.60 3.86 4.01 4.57
    Tm 0.99 0.82 0.76 0.92 0.63 0.68 0.68 0.81
    Yb 6.79 5.61 5.21 6.10 4.33 4.81 4.71 5.50
    Lu 1.06 0.87 0.83 0.94 0.67 0.78 0.74 0.84
    Y 49.6 43.9 40.7 49.0 31.4 35.2 35.9 42.1
    ΣREE 186 169 168 209 192 187 214 281
    LREE 105 97.3 101 128 138 129 154 211
    HREE 31.4 27.4 25.6 31.6 22.1 22.8 24.1 27.6
    LREE/
    HREE
    3.34 3.55 3.95 4.06 6.26 5.63 6.38 7.64
    注:测试工作由天津地质调查中心实验室完成,主量元素采用XRF测试,其中FeO采用氢氟酸、硫酸溶样、重铬酸钾滴定容量法,微量元素采用ICP-MS测试;主量元素含量单位为%,微量和稀土元素含量单位为10-6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   小红山地区花岗斑岩锆石Lu-Hf同位素数据

    Table  3   Zircon Lu-Hf isotopic data of the granite-porphyry in Xiaohongshan area

    点号 年龄/Ma 176Yb/177Hf 176Lu/177Hf 176Hf/177Hf 176Hf/177Hfi εHf(0) εHf(t) TDM /Ma TDMC/Ma
    TW730a
    2 210 0.0536 0.0016 0.282695 0.000021 0.282689 -2.71 1.68 801 1136
    4 215 0.0818 0.0023 0.282730 0.000017 0.282721 -1.49 2.92 766 1061
    5 213 0.1539 0.0041 0.282615 0.000028 0.282599 -5.54 -1.43 981 1335
    7 207 0.0464 0.0015 0.282712 0.000021 0.282706 -2.12 2.21 775 1100
    8 214 0.0303 0.0009 0.282718 0.000020 0.282714 -1.92 2.65 755 1077
    9 211 0.0933 0.0027 0.282701 0.000015 0.282690 -2.51 1.73 818 1133
    10 214 0.1344 0.0045 0.282711 0.000019 0.282693 -2.16 1.92 844 1124
    12 215 0.0388 0.0013 0.282741 0.000018 0.282736 -1.09 3.45 729 1027
    13 209 0.1373 0.0043 0.282940 0.000021 0.282923 5.93 9.93 485 610
    14 214 0.0519 0.0017 0.282795 0.000021 0.282788 0.80 5.25 661 912
    16 213 0.0364 0.0011 0.282795 0.000020 0.282791 0.81 5.34 649 906
    17 213 0.0755 0.0023 0.282749 0.000018 0.282740 -0.81 3.54 738 1020
    18 213 0.0575 0.0016 0.282737 0.000018 0.282731 -1.23 3.22 742 1040
    21 216 0.0288 0.0010 0.282754 0.000022 0.282750 -0.65 3.96 706 996
    22 212 0.0420 0.0014 0.282692 0.000015 0.282687 -2.82 1.65 800 1139
    24 214 0.1892 0.0057 0.282892 0.000021 0.282869 4.24 8.14 583 728
    TW730b
    3 209 0.0274 0.0009 0.282722 0.000020 0.282718 -1.77 2.69 750 1071
    7 204 0.0458 0.0013 0.282711 0.000017 0.282706 -2.17 2.13 774 1103
    11 207 0.0459 0.0013 0.282704 0.000022 0.282699 -2.40 1.96 782 1115
    12 206 0.0539 0.0018 0.282736 0.000023 0.282729 -1.28 3.00 748 1049
    13 207 0.0247 0.0007 0.282801 0.000021 0.282798 1.01 5.45 635 894
    14 207 0.0244 0.0008 0.282690 0.000019 0.282687 -2.91 1.53 791 1143
    15 202 0.0487 0.0015 0.282724 0.000017 0.282719 -1.69 2.56 757 1074
    16 204 0.0391 0.0013 0.282646 0.000017 0.282641 -4.44 -0.15 866 1247
    17 202 0.0305 0.0009 0.282693 0.000019 0.282689 -2.80 1.53 790 1140
    18 208 0.0402 0.0012 0.282736 0.000018 0.282731 -1.29 3.11 737 1044
    19 202 0.0479 0.0014 0.282753 0.000018 0.282748 -0.66 3.60 714 1008
    20 207 0.0280 0.0009 0.282756 0.000019 0.282753 -0.56 3.87 701 995
    21 207 0.0300 0.0009 0.282699 0.000021 0.282695 -2.58 1.83 782 1124
    22 207 0.0434 0.0014 0.282773 0.000015 0.282767 0.02 4.37 686 962
    23 208 0.0599 0.0017 0.282754 0.000022 0.282747 -0.65 3.69 720 1007
    24 208 0.0348 0.0010 0.282700 0.000018 0.282696 -2.56 1.86 782 1123
    注:测试单位为天津地质调查中心实验室,该表中点号与表 1对应
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   小红山地区花岗斑岩锆石饱和温度测试结果

    Table  4   Result from saturated Zr thermometer of the granite-porphyry in Xiaohongshan area

    样品 Zr/10-6 M Tzr/℃
    YQ730.a 218 1.4 819
    YQ730.b 157 1.4 789
    YQ730.c 142 1.4 782
    YQ730.d 142 1.4 782
    YQ730.e 155 1.4 791
    YQ730.f 155 1.4 790
    YQ730.g 148 1.3 789
    YQ730.h 148 1.3 790
    注:TZr = 129000 /[2.95 + 0.85M + ln(469000 /Zrsample)],M为岩石中阳离子的比值, M =(Na + K + 2Ca)/(Al × Si)
    下载: 导出CSV
  • Xiao W J, Mao Q G, Windley B F, et al.Paleozoic multiple accretionary and collisional processes of the Beishan orogenic collage[J].American Journal of Science, 2010, 310:1553-1594. doi: 10.2475/10.2010.12

    Liu X C, Chen B, Jahn B M, et al.Early Paleozoic(ca.465 Ma)eclogites from Beishan(NW China)and their bearing on the tectonic evolution of the southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011, 42(4):715-731. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367912010003147

    Guo Q Q, Xiao W J, Hou Q L, et al.Construction of Late Devonian Dundunshan arc in the Beishan orogen and its implication for tectonics of southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Lithos, 2014, 184-187(1):361-378. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=12623046eb693c8acdf0846752adffb9

    江思宏, 聂凤军.北山地区花岗岩类成因的Nd同位素制约[J].地质学报, 2006, 80(6):826-842. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb200606005

    Su B X, Qin K Z, Sun H, et al.Subduction-induced mantle heterogeneity beneath Eastern Tianshan and Beishan:Insights from Nd-Sr-Hf-O isotopic mapping of Late Paleozoic mafic-ultramafic complexes[J].Lithos, 2012, 134-135(2):41-51. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024493711003847

    Zhang W, Pease V, Wu T R, et al.Discovery of an adakite-like pluton near Dongqiyishan(Beishan, NW China)-Its age and tectonic significance[J].Lithos, 2012, 142-143(6):148-160. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=75185132&site=ehost-live

    Li S, Wilde S A, Wang T.Early Permian post-collisional high-K granitoids from Liuyuan area in southern Beishan orogen, NW China:Petrogenesis and tectonic implications[J].Lithos, 2013, 179:99-119. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.08.002

    李敏, 任邦方, 滕学建, 等.内蒙古北山造山带花岗岩地球化学、锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素特征及地质意义[J].地球科学, 2018, 43(12):4586-4605. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqkx201812023
    李敏, 辛后田, 任邦方, 等.内蒙古哈珠地区晚古生代花岗岩类成因及其构造意义[J].地球科学, 2019, 44(1):328-343. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqkx201901023
    潘志龙, 王硕, 邱振, 等.内蒙古北山地区咸水沟一带早石炭世红柳园组火山岩地球化学、锆石U-Pb年龄及Hf同位素特征[J].地质调查与研究, 2017, 40(02):99-108. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=qhwjyjjz201702003
    刘明强, 王建军, 代文军.甘肃北山红石山地区马鞍山北花岗岩体的单颗粒锆石U-Pb年龄及地质意义[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2006, 25(6):473-479. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yskwxzz200606003
    李舢, 王涛, 童英.中亚造山系中南段早中生代花岗岩类时空分布特征及构造环境[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2010, 29(6):642-662. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yskwxzz201006004

    Li S, Wang T, Wilde S A, et al.Geochronology, petrogenesis and tectonic implications of Triassic granitoids from Beishan, NW China[J].Lithos, 2012, 134-135:123-145. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2011.12.005

    杨合群, 赵国斌, 李英, 等.新疆-甘肃-内蒙古衔接区古生代构造背景与成矿的关系[J].地质通报, 2012, 31(2/3):413-421. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2012020326&flag=1

    Zuo G C, Zhang S L, He G Q, et al.Plate Tectonic characteristics during the Early Paleozoic in Beishan near the Sino-Mongolian Border Region, China[J].Tectonophysics, 1991, 188:385-392. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(91)90466-6

    耿建珍, 李怀坤, 张健, 等.锆石Hf同位素组成的LA-MC-ICP-MS测定[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(10):1508-1513. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20111004&flag=1
    王树庆, 胡晓佳, 赵华雷.内蒙古苏左旗洪格尔地区新发现晚石炭世碱性花岗岩[J].地质调查与研究, 2019, 42(2):81-85. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=qhwjyjjz201902001

    Yuan H L, Gao S, Liu X M, et al.Accurate U-Pb age and trace element determinations of zircon by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry[J].Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 2004, 28(3):353-370. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2004.tb00755.x

    Liu Y S, Gao S, Hu Z C, et al.Continental and oceanic crust recycling-induced melt-peridotite interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen:U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons of mantle xenoliths[J].J.Petrol., 2010, 51(1/2):537-571. http://petrology.oxfordjournals.org/content/51/1-2/537

    Söderlund U, Patchett P J, Veroort J D, et al.The 176Lu decay constant determined by Lu-Hf and U-Pb isotope systematics of Percambrian mafic intrusions[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2004, 219(3/4):311-324. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X04000123

    Bouvier A, Vervoort J D, Patchett P J.The Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd isotopic composition of CHUR:Constraints from unequilibrated chondrites and implications for the bulk composition of terrestrial planets[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2008, 273(1/2):48-57. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X08003828

    Griffin W L, Pearson N J, Elusive E, et al.The Hf isotopes composition of carbonic mantle:LA-MC-ICP-MS analysis of zircon megacrysts in kimberlites[J].Geochim.Cosmochim.Acta, 2000, 64(1):133-147. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00343-9

    Griffin W L, Wang X, Jackson S E, et al.Zircon chemistry and magma mixing, SE China:in-situ analysis of Hf isotopes, Tonglu and Pingtan igneous complexes[J]. Lithos, 2002, 61(3):237-269. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024493702000828

    Koschek G.Origin and significance of the SEM cathodoluminescence from zircon[J].Journal of Microscopy, 1993, 171(3):223-232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03379.x

    Williams I S, Buick A, Cartwright I.An extended episode of early Mesoproterozoic metamorphic fluid flow in the Reynold region, central Australia[J].J.Metamorphic Geol., 1996, 14(1):29-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1996.00029.x

    吴福元, 李献华, 郑永飞, 等.Lu-Hf同位素体系及其岩石学应用[J].岩石学报, 2007, 23(2):185-220. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98200702001

    Whalen J B, Currie K L, Chappell B W.A-Type granites:geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis[J].Contrib.Mineral Petrol., 1987, 95:407-419. doi: 10.1007/BF00402202

    刘昌实, 陈小明, 陈培荣, 等.A型岩套的分类、判别标志和成因[J].高校地质学报, 2003, 9(4):573-591. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gxdzxb200304011

    Miller C F, McDowell S M, Mapes R W.Hot and cold granites? Implications of zircon saturation temperatures and preservation of inheritance[J].Geology, 2003, 31:529-532. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0529:HACGIO>2.0.CO;2

    Ameilin Y, Lee D C, Halliiday A N, et al.Nature of the Earth's earliest crust from hafninm isotopes in single detrital zircon[J].Nature, 1999, 399(6733):252-255. doi: 10.1038/20426

    Bleousova E A, Grifflin W L, O'Reilly S Y.Zircon crystal morphology, trace element signatures and Hf isotope composition as a tool for petrogenetic modelling:Examples from eastern Australian granitoids[J].Journal of Petrology, 2006, 47(2):329-353. doi: 10.1093/petrology/egi077

    Kemp A I S, Hawkesworth C J, Foster G L, et al.Magmatic and crustal differentiation history of granitic rocks from Hf-O isotopes in zircon[J].Science, 2007, 16:980-983. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=1dbf87dba7ccb9472238f299f960285c

    Ravikant V, Wu F Y, Ji W Q, et al.U-Pb Age and Hf isotopic constraints of detrital zircons from the Himalayan foreland Subathu sub-basin on the Tertiary palaeogeography of the Himalaya[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2011, 304(3/4):356-368. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=fb603789424af69c5acd28427bf0aff8

    Murphy J B, Nance R D.Sm-Nd isotopic systematics as tectonic tracers:an example from West Avalonia in the Canadian Appalachians[J].Earth-Science Reviews, 2002, 59(1/4):77-100. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825202000703

    Kröner A, Kovach V, Belousova E, et al.Reassessment of continental growth during the accretionary history of the Central Asian Orogenie Belt[J].Gondwana Res., 2014, 25:103-125. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X13000415

    Jahn B M, Windley B, Natal'in B, et al.Phanerozoic Continental Growth in Central Asia[J].J.Asian Earth Sci., 2004, 23(5):599-603. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(03)00124-X

    Windley B F, Alexeiev D, Xiao W J, et al.Tectonic models for accretion of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Journal of the Geological Society, 2007, 164:31-47. doi: 10.1144/0016-76492006-022

    Sun M, Yuan C, Xiao W, et al.Zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic study of gneissic rocks from the Chinese Altai:Progressive Accretionary history in the Early to Middle Palaeozoic[J].Chem.Geol., 2008, 247:352-383. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ChGeo.247..352S/abstract

    Wilhem C, Windley B F, Stampfli G M.The Altaids of Central Asia:A tectonic and evolutionary innovative review[J].Earth_Sci.Rev., 2012, 113:303-341. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.04.001

    Zong K Q, Klemd R, Yuan Y, et al.The assembly of Rodinia:The correlation of Early Neoproterozoic(ca.900 Ma)high-grade metamorphism and continental arc formation in the southern Beishan Orogen, southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt(CAOB)[J].Precambrian Research, 2017, 290:32-48. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2016.12.010

图(9)  /  表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2303
  • HTML全文浏览量:  463
  • PDF下载量:  1742
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-09-09
  • 修回日期:  2019-11-19
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-08-15
  • 刊出日期:  2020-09-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回