• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库核心期刊

内蒙古北山造山带时空结构与古亚洲洋演化

辛后田, 牛文超, 田健, 滕学建, 段霄龙

辛后田, 牛文超, 田健, 滕学建, 段霄龙. 2020: 内蒙古北山造山带时空结构与古亚洲洋演化. 地质通报, 39(9): 1297-1316.
引用本文: 辛后田, 牛文超, 田健, 滕学建, 段霄龙. 2020: 内蒙古北山造山带时空结构与古亚洲洋演化. 地质通报, 39(9): 1297-1316.
XIN Houtian, NIU Wenchao, TIAN Jian, TENG Xuejian, DUAN Xiaolong. 2020: Spatio-temporal structure of Beishan orogenic belt and evolution of Paleo-Asian Ocean, Inner Mongolia. Geological Bulletin of China, 39(9): 1297-1316.
Citation: XIN Houtian, NIU Wenchao, TIAN Jian, TENG Xuejian, DUAN Xiaolong. 2020: Spatio-temporal structure of Beishan orogenic belt and evolution of Paleo-Asian Ocean, Inner Mongolia. Geological Bulletin of China, 39(9): 1297-1316.

内蒙古北山造山带时空结构与古亚洲洋演化

基金项目: 

中国地质调查局项目《阴山成矿带小狐狸山和雅布赖地区地质矿产调查项目》 DD20160039

详细信息
    作者简介:

    辛后田(1969-), 男, 博士, 教授级高级工程师, 从事岩石大地构造方面的研究。E-mail:2680452804@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: P542

Spatio-temporal structure of Beishan orogenic belt and evolution of Paleo-Asian Ocean, Inner Mongolia

  • 摘要:

    内蒙古北山造山带自北向南发育红石山-百合山、月牙山-洗肠井和帐房山-玉石山3条蛇绿构造混杂岩带。其中北部的2条蛇绿岩带揭示了北山造山带两阶段演化的历史:月牙山-洗肠井蛇绿混杂岩带洋壳形成于530~520 Ma,沿该带多处保存较完好的蛇绿岩洋壳残块(洋壳结构具向北变新特征),与北侧的早古生代公婆泉岩浆弧(由南向北岛弧成熟度变高)共同指示了北山洋向北俯冲消减的过程,即490 Ma初始俯冲,450~440 Ma为俯冲峰期,430~420 Ma为同碰撞阶段,400 Ma的双峰式岩浆岩组合指示了北山洋的消亡和后造山伸展的过程;红石山-百合山蛇绿混杂岩带是发育在雀儿山-圆包山岛弧基础上的SSZ型蛇绿岩,弧后开裂洋壳的形成与南侧最早发育的岛弧岩浆作用年龄接近(340~320 Ma),310~290 Ma俯冲峰期造成南侧白山岩浆弧大量的岩浆活动,早二叠世末期(275 Ma)的辉长岩和花岗岩侵位及早—中二叠世双堡塘组下部的角度不整合均反映了红石山洋盆的闭合。前人所划"石板井-小黄山蛇绿岩带"实为一条早古生代发育的深大断裂,沿带发育中基性侵入体及少量超基性岩,后期(志留纪末)叠加有较强的韧性剪切变形。中生代以来的走滑作用和逆冲推覆构造改造了古生代的构造格架,使红石山-百合山蛇绿混杂岩带向北左行切错了十余千米,北山南部的中—新元古界推覆至下古生界之上。对内蒙古北山造山带时空结构的厘定,有助于中亚造山带造山作用过程的理解及其对古生代地壳增生的深入研究,也对银额盆地晚古生代新层系油气资源勘查起到基础支撑。

    Abstract:

    The Beishan orogenic belt is composed of Late Paleozoic Hongshishan-Baiheshan ophiolite mélange belt, Early Paleozoic Yueyashan-Xichangjing ophiolite mélange belt and late Paleozoic Zhangfangshan-Yushishan ophiolite mélange belt from north to south in Inner Mongolia.The "Shibanjing-Xiaohuangshan ophiolite belt" defined by previous researchers is actually an Early Paleozoic trans-crustal fault zone, across which there are intermediate-mafic rocks and minor ultramafic rocks. At the end of the Silurian, intense ductile shear deformation was superimposed upon it.The two ophiolite belts in the north reveal the two-stage evolution history of Beishan orogenic belt:The Yueyashan-Xichangjing ophiolite mélanges belt was formed from 530 Ma to 520 Ma, and there exist many intact ophiolite oceanic crust fragments along the belt(the oceanic crust structure has the characteristics of becoming younger from south to north), which, together with the Early Paleozoic Gonpoquan magmatic arc(the maturity of island arc increased from south to north), indicates the process of northward subduction of the Beishan Ocean, which included the initial subduction of 490 Ma, the peak period of subduction ranging from 450 Ma to 440 Ma, and the syn-collision stage ranging from 430 Ma to 420 Ma.The 400 Ma bimodal magmatic rock assemblage indicates the extinction of Beishan Ocean and the beginning of a new tectonic cycle.The Hongshishan-Baiheshanophiolite mélange belt is a SSZ-type ophiolite developed on the basis of the Quershan-Yuanbaoshan island arc.The formation time of the back arc cracked oceanic crust approached the earliest developed island arc magmatism in the south, which happened from 340 Ma to 320 Ma.The period of 310~290 Ma subduction caused a lot of magmatic activities that formed the Baishan magmatic arc.The existence of gabbro and granite bimodal intrusions at the end of Early Permian(275 Ma)and the Early-Middle Permian angular unconformity events of the Shuangbaotang Formation commonly reflect the closure of the Hongshishan Ocean basin.The strike-slip and thrust nappe structures since Mesozoic have transformed the Paleozoic tectonic framework, resulting in the northward left-lateral slipping of Hongshishan-Baiheshanophiolite mélange belt for more than 10 kilometers and the thrusting of Middle-Upper Proterozoic strata on the Early Paleozoic strata.The authors determined the spatial and temporal structure of the Beishan orogenic belt, which is helpful to the further research on the orogenesis and crustal accretion process of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, and also provides research basis for the exploration of the Late Paleozoic hydrocarbon resources in the Yin'e basin.

  • 三水盆地是南海北部陆缘唯一具有大规模新生代火山喷发记录的沉积盆地。盆地新生代火山喷发组合以粗面岩、玄武岩和流纹岩为代表,总体体现板内的大陆裂谷环境[1-10]。根据前人研究,三水盆地存在13期火山喷发[1-2, 5-6, 8, 11],其中大多数集中于古新世和始新世。时代最新的玄武岩年龄为38Ma[12],这也是南海北部大陆边缘地区迄今获得的南海扩张之前最晚的火山喷发年龄。本文报道的西樵山独岗流纹岩和石头村玄武岩样品是新近采得,应用K-Ar法经过严格的测试和检验,分别测得28.25Ma和29.27Ma的同位素地质年龄。这一新的结果将三水盆地的火山喷发序列推迟至渐新世中期,也改变了长期以来关于南海扩张期间(32~ 16Ma)无陆上火山喷发活动的传统认识,对于区域构造环境的解读和南海扩张过程的研究具有重要意义。

    三水盆地位于广东省南部,是中国华南大陆最贴近南海的内陆盆地。盆地主要断裂带是吴川-四会断裂带、西江断裂带和三水-西樵山断裂带,新生代地层自下而上有莘庄村组、㘵心组、宝月组和华涌组。

    三水盆地是南海北部唯一存在早新生代大规模火山喷发的陆缘盆地,前人总结的13期火山喷发活动中绝大部分(10~11期)发生在古新世—中始新世(60.5~38Ma),喷发岩的主要种类为玄武岩、粗面岩和流纹岩,地表出露地点主要有紫洞、王借岗、走马营、西樵山、狮岭、黎边山等地,基性岩与中酸性岩呈近南北向双列线性展布。本文分析样品是采自石头村的玄武岩和独岗的流纹岩(图 1)。

    图  1  三水盆地火山岩样品位置分布(底图据参考文献[13-14];资料据参考文献[11-12, 15-16])
    Figure  1.  The simplified geological map and the distribution of samples in Sanshui Basin

    西樵山是三水盆地出露面积最大的火山喷发点,各类熔岩、集块岩、熔结凝灰岩、凝灰岩发育齐全。根据以往报道,该地粗面岩数量巨大,年龄一般为45Ma,是盆地火山活动最强烈的第10期喷发的主要代表。独岗贴近西樵山,可能是西樵山火山体系的一部分,也可能属于后期的独立喷发。独岗岩体呈灰黄色,柱状节理非常发育,化学分析结果表明其为典型的流纹岩。石头村位于三水盆地东北部,是盆地内玄武岩出露的主要地区之一,但随着当地经济建设的发展,露头已被挖掘殆尽,本文的分析样品来自某工程施工现场。

    测试玄武岩选用剔除斑晶的基质,流纹岩选用透长石单矿物,测试在北京大学造山带与地壳演化教育部重点实验室完成,K含量测量采用锂内标钠缓冲火焰光度计法,火焰光度计型号为6400,所用标样为房山花岗闪长岩体黑云母(编号ZBH-25)和腾冲芒棒玄武岩(编号TC-18)。Ar含量测量采用VSS-RGA-10质谱计,稀释法静态测量,标样为房山花岗闪长岩体黑云母(编号ZBH-25)。计算过程中的标准值据桑海清等[17]。计算所用衰变常数λ= 5.543×10-10/a,40K/∑K=1.167×10-4

    玄武岩测试年龄为29.27±1.52Ma,流纹岩测试结果为28.25±1.14Ma,均属渐新世,具体测试结果见表 1。测试过程中所选标样房山花岗闪长岩体黑云母(编号ZBH-25)K含量标准值为7.60%,实测值7.04%,腾冲芒棒玄武岩(编号TC-18)K含量标准值1.04%,实测值1.01%。Ar含量测量标样ZBH-25标准值为132.9±1.3Ma,实测值为132.47Ma。测试方法合理,数据可靠,笔者认为测试年龄可为后续科学研究提供可靠的年代学依据。

    表  1  三水盆地火山岩K-Ar测年数据结果
    Table  1.  The K-Ar isotopic dating results of the volcanic rocks in Sanshui Basin
    岩性 玄武岩 流纹岩
    K含量/% 1.70±2.56 4.92±2.92
    称样量/g 0.0211 0.0101
    40Ar*/(mol·g-1) 8.70E-11 2.43E-10
    40Ar*% 48.8661 54.64888
    38Ar/mol 7.12E-12 7.15E-12
    40/38Ar 0.527478±2.51E-05 0.628125±0.000384
    36/38Ar 0.000932±2.01E-05 0.000984±7.39E-06
    40Ar*/40K 0.001715±8.97E-05 0.001654±6.71E-05
    年龄值/Ma 29.27±1.52 28.25±1.14
    注:40Ar*代表放射性成因40Ar
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    石头村玄武岩呈黑色,少见气孔,具斑状结构(图 2-a),斑晶为斜长石(15%)、橄榄石(10%)和辉石(5%)。基质为拉斑玄武结构,包含斜长石微晶(20%)和火山玻璃(30%),橄榄石形状不规则,晶体较大,有不规则裂纹且个别橄榄石有蛇纹石化现象(图 2-b)。辉石形状较规则,呈八边形,有裂纹,发育较弱的环带,且裂纹穿过环带(图 2-c)。斜长石形状规则,发育大量环带,且环带清晰、完整,无裂纹、无蚀变现象。

    图  2  三水盆地石头村玄武岩手标本(a)及显微照片(b、c)(b、c左为单偏光,右为正交光)
    b—橄榄石及蛇纹石化;c—辉石环带;Ol—橄榄石;Aug—辉石;Cl—斜长石;Srp—蛇纹石
    Figure  2.  Hand specimen(a) and photomicrographs(b, c) of Shitoucun basalt in Sanshui Basin

    流纹岩呈灰色,少见气孔,斑状结构,块状构造(图 3-a),矿物组成为长石、石英、黑云母。斑晶主要为碱性长石(10%),偶见长石斑晶中包裹小颗粒长石(图 3-b),碱性长石斑晶呈自形-半自形,有不规则裂纹,大小为1~1.5mm,基质为微晶结构,碱性长石微晶半定向排列,其间充填有玻璃质成分。副矿物为菱铁矿(1%~2%)(图 3-c)。以上岩石矿物特征与前人研究的时代较老的同类岩石一致[5, 11, 18]

    图  3  三水盆地独岗流纹岩手标本(a)及显微照片(b、c左为单偏光,右为正交光)
    b—长石;c—菱铁矿及辉石;Aug—辉石;Afs—碱性长石;Mgs—菱铁矿
    Figure  3.  Hand specimen(a) and photomicrographs(b, c) of Dugang rhyolite in Sanshui Basin

    石头村玄武岩和独岗流纹岩元素地球化学分析数据见表 2。石头村玄武岩(图 4)SiO2含量为47.57%,TiO2含量为2.78%(大于2%),K2O+Na2O含量为4.54%,且Na2O>K2O。该类岩石富集Nb、Ta、Zr、Hf等不相容元素,稀土元素总量为133.74×10-6,轻稀土元素富集,重稀土元素亏损,La/Yb值为12.12,Ce/Yb值为25.1。在微量元素蛛网图上具有与OIB(洋岛玄武岩)相似的地球化学特征(图 5- a)。La/Nb值为0.45,Nb/Zr值为0.28,Th/Nb值为0.05,与地幔热柱玄武岩特征相似[19-20]。构造环境投图判别为板内玄武岩(图 6-a)。以上特征均与盆地时代较老的玄武岩一致(图 5-a),指示伸展拉张的陆内裂谷环境。

    表  2  三水盆地火山岩地球化学数据分析结果
    Table  2.  The major, trace and rare earth elements analysis data of the volcanic rocks in Sanshui Basin
    地名 石头村 独岗
    样品编号 14SS004 14SS013
    岩性 玄武岩 流纹岩
    SiO2 47.57 70.43
    TiO2 2.78 0.24
    Al2O3 17.34 14.24
    Fe2O3 12.07 3.28
    MnO 0.15 0.09
    MgO 5.06 0.18
    CaO 9.67 0.17
    Na20 2.82 5.47
    K20 1.7 4.99
    P2O5 0.49 0.01
    总计 99.65 99.1
    Be 1.25 7.74
    Sc 24.3 1.42
    V 240 1.4
    Cr 67.3 1.68
    Co 42 9.06
    Ni 40.7 1.07
    Cu 45.6 7.08
    Zn 100 211
    Ga 22.6 44.3
    Rb 32.4 325
    Sr 768 8.22
    Y 24.2 159
    Zr 187 1504
    Nb 53.1 460
    Cs 0.32 2.54
    Ba 318 19
    La 24 175
    Ce 49.7 324
    Pr 6.48 36.8
    Nd 27.4 125
    Sm 6.19 24.1
    Eu 2.16 0.21
    Gd 5.96 23.3
    Tb 0.92 4.21
    Dy 5.01 26
    Ho 0.91 5.43
    Er 2.4 16.2
    Tm 0.34 2.64
    Yb 1.98 16.4
    Lu 0.29 2.46
    Hf 4.56 37.4
    Ta 3.13 26.5
    Pb 2.57 37.6
    Th 2.55 58
    U 0.73 14.7
    注:主量元素含量单位为%,微量和稀土元素为10-6
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格
    图  4  火山岩岩性判别图
    (底图据参考文献[21];盆地火山岩据参考文献[6-7, 12, 15-16])
    Figure  4.  SiO2 versus K2O+Na2O diagram for volcanic rocks
    图  5  三水盆地玄武岩(a)和流纹岩(b)微量元素蛛网图[22]
    (a对比数据据参考文献[6, 12, 15-16, 22];b对比数据据参考文献[5-7, 12, 15-16, 23-24])
    Figure  5.  Trace elements spidergram for basalts (a) and rhyolites (b) in Sanshui Basin
    图  6  玄武岩(a)和流纹岩(b)构造环境判别图
    (a底图据参考文献[25];数据据参考文献[6-7, 12, 15-16])和流纹岩构造环境判别图;b底图据参考文献[26];A型花岗岩数据据参考文献[27-28];其他对比数据据参考文献[5-7, 12, 15-16, 18])
    A—岛弧拉斑玄武岩;B—MORB、岛弧拉斑玄武岩、钙碱玄武岩;C—钙碱性玄武岩;D—板内玄武岩;ORG—洋脊花岗岩;WPG—板内花岗岩;VAG—火山弧花岗岩;syn-COLG—同碰撞花岗岩
    Figure  6.  The discrimination of tectonic setting of basalts (a) and rhyolites (b)

    独岗流纹岩(图 4)SiO2含量为70.43%,Na2O为5.47%,K2O为4.99%,Al2O3为14.24%,属高钾钙碱性;富集Nb、Ta、Zr、Hf、Th等不相容元素,亏损Ba、Sr、P、Ti、Eu等;稀土元素总量为781.75×10-6,轻稀土元素总量为708.41×10-6,La/Yb值为10.67,Ce/ Yb值为19.76,具有负Eu异常,构造环境判别图显示其产出于板内环境(图 6-b)。与A型花岗岩特征相似,在微量元素蛛网图上与红海Afar地幔柱流纹岩具有一致的分布曲线(图 5-b)。以上特征与盆地时代较老的流纹岩一致,属于板内拉张的陆内裂谷环境。

    综上所述,石头村玄武岩和独岗流纹岩与三水盆地新生代基性岩和酸性岩的基本特征一致,均产自板内构造环境,表明它们与前人总结的研究区古、始新世双峰式火山喷发模式一脉相承[5-7, 15],仍属于陆内裂谷体系[1-6]

    三水盆地古新世—始新世发生大规模的火山喷发活动,有“三水热点”之称[5-8]。这种多期次、多旋回的激烈火山活动在华南地区同时期构造盆地中“一枝独秀”,没有类似的地域可供比拟。盆地基性和中酸性喷出岩分别与OIB和Afar地区同类型火山岩具有相似的地球化学特征,可能受控于地幔柱上涌[5-6],代表大陆裂谷[1-6],是大陆边缘发生破裂的产物。结合南海演化过程及北部陆域的区域地质特征,推测盆地火山活动的性质和时间(38~ 60Ma),大体相当于Afar于红海开裂,属于威尔逊旋回中洋盆扩张前的陆内裂谷阶段。

    大西洋、红海的演化路径是体现威尔逊旋回的典型范例,即它们在发生扩张的同时,邻近陆域伴有长期的裂谷型火山喷发活动。北大西洋扩张始于早侏罗世末期,北美大陆边缘保存有至新生代早期的火山记录,红海扩张发生在渐新世初,其阿拉伯一侧的火山喷发活动至今未绝。南海被认为是大西洋式张裂形成的海盆[29-32],但是根据以往资料,在南海扩张期间其周缘陆地鲜有岩浆活动记录,即使如三水盆地这类新生代早期具有陆内裂谷火山活动特征的火山喷发中心,也在南海扩张之前的始新世中晚期(38Ma)完全停止了岩浆活动。这一现象受到研究者的广泛关注[8-9, 33-38],但迄今尚没有合理的解释。

    在南海海域自始新世中晚期至南海开裂期间基本没有火山记录,洋岛火山岩年龄多集中在3.69~ 18.61Ma[39-43],基本属于南海扩张停止以后的岩浆活动的产物,对理解南海早期开裂-扩张机制可能不具有太大意义。而本文火山岩喷发正值南海早期扩张阶段,玄武岩和流纹岩构成常见的双峰裂谷模式,与盆地之前的火山活动较一致,将伴随南海扩张的陆域火山活动记录拉长至渐新世中期,改变了南海扩张期间周边陆域无重要火山活动的传统认识。虽然仅从它们的发现还不足以构建南海早期的开裂-扩张模式,但是对传统认识已经形成突破,为正确理解南海早期演化提供了新的材料和视角。

    三水盆地渐新世火山岩的发现修正了关于南海早期扩张过程中在其北部陆域缺乏火山喷发记录的传统认识,将双峰式陆内裂谷岩浆活动延续至渐新世中期,即南海早期扩张阶段。这一新的认识对于通过海陆对比进一步分析和总结南海的早期演化模式具有重要意义。

    致谢: 中国地质大学(北京)王根厚教授、中国地质大学(武汉)张克信教授、内蒙古地质调查院邵积东教授级高工、中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心王惠初研究员与笔者在野外一同进行了调研;中国地质科学院李锦轶研究员与笔者就中亚大地构造问题进行了研讨;中国地质大学(武汉)张克信教授和中国地质科学院地质力学所胡健民研究员审阅了全文并提出了建设性修改意见;在此一并谨致谢忱。
  • 图  1   内蒙古北山造山带大地构造单元划分图

    11—红柳园晚古生代裂谷;Ⅰ12(F5)—帐房山-玉石山晚古生代蛇绿混杂岩带;Ⅰ13—古硐井中-新元古代克拉通盆地;Ⅱ11(F4)—月牙山-洗肠井早古生代蛇绿混杂岩带;Ⅱ12—公婆泉早古生代岩浆弧;Ⅱ13—明水-旱山地块;Ⅱ14—白山晚古生代岩浆弧;Ⅱ15(F1)—红石山-百合山晚古生代蛇绿混杂岩带;Ⅱ21—黑鹰山晚古生代弧后盆地;Ⅱ22—雀儿山-圆包山早、中古生代岛弧带;F2—白梁-三个井构造带;F3—石板井-小黄山构造带;F6—星星峡走滑断裂;F7—清河沟走滑断裂;F8—红梁子走滑断裂

    Figure  1.   The tectonic units of the Beishan Orogenic Belt, Inner Mongolia

    图  2   内蒙古北山造山带古生代构造-地层建造图

    ①一帐房山-玉石山蛇绿混杂岩带; ②一月牙山-洗肠井蛇绿混杂岩带; ③--红石山-百合山蛇绿混杂岩带

    Figure  2.   The Paleozoic tectonostratigraphic units of the Beishan orogenic Belt, Inner Mongolia

    图  3   内蒙古北山造山带大地构造演化图

    Figure  3.   The tectonic evolution of the Beishan orogenic belt, Inner Mongolia

    表  1   内蒙古北山地区构造单元划分

    Table  1   The division of tectonic units for the Beishan Orogenic Belt, Inner Mongolia

    一级构造单元 二级构造单元 三级构造单元
    中亚造山带(北山造山带) 西伯利亚南缘陆缘增生带 雀儿山-圆包山早—中古生代岛弧带
    黑鹰山晚古生代弧后盆地
    红石山-百合山晚古生代蛇绿混杂岩带
    马鬃山微陆块 白山晚古生代岩浆弧
    明水-旱山地块
    公婆泉早古生代岩浆弧
    月牙山-洗肠井早古生代蛇绿混杂岩带
    华北-塔里木板块 敦煌地块 西双鹰山早古生代被动陆缘盆地
    古硐井中—新元古代克拉通盆地
    账房山-玉石山晚古生代蛇绿混杂岩带
    红柳园晚古生代裂谷
    下载: 导出CSV
  • Sengör A M C, Natal'In B A, Burtman V S, et al.Evolution of the Altaid tectonic collage and Palaeozoic crustal growth in Eurasia[J].Nature, 1993, 364:299-307. doi: 10.1038/364299a0

    Xiao W, Santosh M.The western Central Asian Orogenic Belt:A window to accretionary orogenesis and continental growth[J].Gondwana Research, 2014, 25:1429-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2014.01.008

    Kröner A, Windley B F, Badarch G, et al.Accretionary growth and crust formation in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt and comparison with the Arabian Nubian-Shield[J].Memoir of the Geological Society of America, 2007, 200:181-209. doi: 10.1130/2007.1200(11)

    Xiao W J, Huang B T, Han C M, et al.A review of the western part of the Altaids:A key to understanding the architecture of accretionary orogens[J].Gondwana Research, 2010, 18(2/3):253-273. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X10000262

    Xiao W J, Mao Q G, Windley B F, et al.Paleozoic multiple accretionary and collisional processes of the Beishan orogenic collage[J].American Journal of Science, 2010, 310:1553-1594. doi: 10.2475/10.2010.12

    Safonova I, Seltmann R, Kröner A, et al.A new concept of continental construction in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Episodes, 2011, 34:186-196. doi: 10.18814/epiiugs/2011/v34i3/005

    Jian P, Kröner A, Jahn B M, et al.Zircon ages of metamorphic and magmatic rocks within peridotite-bearing mélanges:Crucial time constraints on early Carboniferous extensional tectonics in the Chinese Tianshan[J].Lithos, 2013, 172/173:243-266. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.04.018

    Cai K D, Sun M, Yuan C, et al.Prolonged magmatism, juvenile nature and tectonic evolution of the Chinese Altai, NW China:evidence from zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic study of Paleozoic granitoids[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011, 42:949-968. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.11.020

    Liu W, Liu X J, Xiao W J.Massive granitoid production, but not massive continental-crust growth in the Chinese Altay (CA)-an integration of zircon U-Pb age and Hf isotope, geochemical and Nd-Sr isotopic compositions of granitoids, volcanics, and metasedimentary rock of the CA as compared with its southern and northern terrains[J].American Journal of Science, 2012, 312:629-684. doi: 10.2475/06.2012.02

    Han B F, Wang S G, Jahn B M, et al.Depleted-mantle source for the Ulungur River A-type granites from North Xinjiang, China:Geochemistry and Nd-Sr isotopic evidence, and implications for Phanerozoic crustal growth[J].Chemical Geology, 1997, 138(3):135-159. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000925419700003X

    Chen B, Jahn B M.Genesis of post-collisional granitoids and basement nature of the Junggar Terrance, NW China:Nd-Sr isotope and trace element evidence[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2004, 23(5):692-703. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000035533767510_cea5.html

    Seltmann R, Konopelko D, Biske G, et al.Hercynian post-collisional magmatism in the context of Paleozoic magmatic evolution of the Tien Shan orogenic belt[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011, 42(5):821-838. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.08.016

    Yuan C, Sun M, Wilde S A, et al.Post-collisional plutons in the Balikun area, East Chinese Tianshan:evolving magmatism in response to extension and slab break-off[J].Lithos, 2010, 119:269-288. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2010.07.004

    Yarmolyuk V V, Kovalenko V I, Sal'nikova E B, et al.Geochronology of igneous rocks and formation of the late Paleozoic South Mongolian active margin of the Siberian continent[J].Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation, 2008, 16:162-181. doi: 10.1134/S0869593808020056

    Jahn B M, Litvinovsky B A, Zanvilevich A N, et al.Peralkaline granitoid magmatism in the Mongolian-Transbaikalian Belt:Evolution, petrogenesis and tectonic significance[J].Lithos, 2009, 113(3/4):521-539. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024493709002643

    Jian P, Liu D Y, Kröner A, et al.Evolution of a Permian intraoceanic arc-trench system in the Solonker suture zone, Central Asian Orogenic belt, China and Mongolia[J].Lithos, 2010, 118:169-190. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2010.04.014

    Wu F Y, Sun D Y, Ge W C.Geochronology of the Phanerozoic granitoids in northeastern China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011, 41:1-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.11.014

    Khain E V, Bibikova E V, Kröner A, et al.The most ancient ophiolite of Central Asian fold belt:U-Pb and Pb-Pb zircon ages for the Dunzhungur Complex, Eastern Sayan, Siberia, and geodynamic implications[J].Earth and Planet Science Letters, 2002, 199:311-325. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00587-3

    Jahn B M, Windley B, Natal'in B.Phanerozoic continental growth in Central Asia[J].J.Asian Earth Science, 2004, 23:599-603. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(03)00124-X

    Windley B F, Kröner A, Guo J, et al.Neoproterozoic to Paleozoic geology of the Altai orogen, NW China:new zircon age data and tectonic evolution[J].Journal of Geology, 2002, 110:719-739. doi: 10.1086/342866

    Li Y J, Wang G, Santosh M, et al.Subduction initiation of the SE paleo-Asian Ocean:Evidence from a well preserved intra-oceanic forearc ophiolite fragment in central Inner Mongolia[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2020, 535:116087.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116087" target="_blank"> https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116087.

    Kovalenkoa V I, Yarmolyuka V V, Kovach V P, et al.Isotope provinces, mechanisms of generation and sources of the continental crust in the Central Asian mobile belt:geological and isotopic evidence[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2004, 23:605-627. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(03)00130-5

    Cawood P A, Kröner A.Earth accretionary orogens in space and time[J].Geological Society of London Special Publication, 2009, 318:1-36. doi: 10.1144/SP318.1

    Wilhem C, Windley B F, Stampfli G M.The Altaids of Central Asia:a tectonic and evolutionary innovativereview[J].Earth Science Review, 2012, 113:303-341. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.04.001

    Kröner A, Kovach V, Belousova E, et al.Reassessment of continental growth during the accretionary history of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Gondwana Research, 2014, 25:103-125. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2012.12.023

    Xiao W J, Windley B F, Yuan C, et al.Paleozoic multiple subduction-accretion processes of the southern Altaids[J].American Journal of Science, 2009, 309:221-270. doi: 10.2475/03.2009.02

    Xiao W J, Windley B F, Sun S, et al.A tale of amalgamation of three collage systems in the Permian Middle Triassic in Central Asia:oroclines, sutures and terminal accretion[J].Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2015, 43:477-507. doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-060614-105254

    左国朝, 张淑玲, 何国琦, 等.北山地区早古生代板块构造特征[J].地质科学, 1990, 4:305-314. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000000368852
    左国朝, 刘义科, 刘春燕.甘新蒙北山地区构造格局及演化[J].甘肃地质学报, 2003, 12(1):1-15. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gsdzxb200301001
    刘雪亚, 王荃.中国西部北山造山带的大地构造及其演化[J].地学研究, 1995, 28:7-48. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=HY000002240926
    何世平, 任秉琛, 姚文光, 等.甘肃内蒙古北山地区构造单元划分[J].西北地质, 2002, 35(4):30-40. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdz200204004
    杨合群, 李英, 赵国斌, 等.北山蛇绿岩特征及构造属性[J].西北地质, 2010, 43(1):26-36. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdz201001002
    李向民, 余吉远, 王国强, 等.甘肃北山地区芨芨台子蛇绿岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb测年及其地质意义[J].地质通报, 2012, 31(12):2025-2031. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZQYD201212011.htm

    Windley B F, Alexeiev D, Xiao W J, et al.Tectonic models for accretion of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Journal of the Geological Society, 2007, 164(12):31-47. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=407c8a0b623113b1dd6b69ee8fde6a21

    Li S, Wang T, Wilde S A, et al.Geochronology, petrogenesis and tectonic implications of Triassic granitoids from Beishan, NW China[J].Lithos, 2012, 134/135:123-145. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2011.12.005

    Song D F, Xiao W J, Han C M, et al.Provenance of metasedimentary rocks from the Beishan orogenic collage, southern Altaids:constraints from detrital zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic data[J].Gondwana Research, 2013, 24:1127-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2013.02.002

    贺振宇, 宗克清, 姜洪颖, 等.北山造山带南部早古生代构造演化:来自花岗岩的约束[J].岩石学报, 2014, 30(8):2324-2338. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94579X/201408/661925033.html

    Zhang W, Pease V, Meng Q, et al.Timing, petrogenesis, and setting of granites from the southern Beishan late Palaeozoic granitic belt, Northwest China and implications for their tectonicevolution[J].International Geology Review, 2015, 57:1975-1991. doi: 10.1080/00206814.2015.1045944

    Shi Y R, Jian P, Kröner A, et al.Zircon ages and Hf isotopic compositions of Ordovician and Carboniferous granitoids from central Inner Mongolia and their significance for early and late Paleozoic evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2016, 117:153-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.12.007

    He Z Y, Klemd R, Yan L L, et al.The origin and crustal evolution of microcontinents in the Beishan orogen of the southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 185:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.05.012

    周国庆, 赵建新, 李献华.内蒙古月牙山蛇绿岩特征及形成的构造背景:地球化学和Sr-Nd同位素制约[J].地球化学, 2000, 29(2):108-119. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DQHX200002001.htm
    龚全胜, 刘明强, 梁明宏, 等.北山造山带大地构造相及构造演化[J].西北地质, 2003, 36(1):11-17. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdz200301002
    杨合群, 李英, 李文明, 等.北山成矿构造背景概论[J].西北地质, 2008, 41(1):22-28. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdz200801002
    邵积东, 王惠, 张梅, 等.内蒙古大地构造单元划分及其地质特征[J].西部资源, 2011, 2:51-56. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbzy201102056
    何国琦, 李茂松, 刘德权, 等.中国新疆古生代地壳演化及成矿[M].乌鲁木齐:新疆人民出版社, 香港:香港文化教育出版社, 1994:1-437.
    李锦轶, 何国琦, 徐新, 等.新疆北部及邻区地壳构造格架及其形成过程的初步探讨[J].地质学报, 2006, 80(1):150-170. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb200601017
    孙立新, 张家辉, 任邦方, 等.北山造山带白云山蛇绿混杂岩的地球化学特征、时代及地质意义[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2017, 2:131-147. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yskwxzz201702001
    聂凤军, 江思宏, 白大明, 等.北山地区金属矿床成矿规律及找矿方向[M].北京:地质出版社, 2002:1-408.

    Xiao W J, Windley B F, Han C M, et al.Late Paleozoic to early Triassic multiple roll-back and oroclinal bending of the Mongolia collage in Central Asia[J].Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 186:94-128. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.020

    Zheng R, Wu T, Zhang W, et al.Late Paleozoic subduction system in the southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt:evidences from geochronology and geochemistry of the Xiaohuangshan ophiolite in the Beishan orogenic belt[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2013, 62:463-475. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.033

    李向民, 余吉远, 王国强, 等.甘肃北山红柳园地区泥盆系三个井组和墩墩山群LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb测年及其意义[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(10):1501-1507. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20111003&flag=1

    Yu J Y, Guo L, Li J X, et al.The petrogenesis of sodic granites in the Niujuanzi area and constraints on the Paleozoic tectonic evolution of the Beishan region, NW China[J].Lithos, 2016, 256/257:250-268. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2016.04.003

    Niu Y Z, Liu C Y, Shi G R, et al.Unconformity-bounded Upper Paleozoic megasequences in the Beishan region (NW China) and implications for the timing of the Paleo-Asian Ocean closure[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2018, 167:11-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.06.019

    Mao Q G, Xiao W J, Windley B F, et al.The Liuyuan complex in the Beishan, NW China:a Carboniferous-Permian ophiolitic fore-arc sliver in the southern Altaids[J].Geological Magazine, 2012, 149:483-509. doi: 10.1017/S0016756811000811

    Tian Z H, Xiao W J, Windley B F, et al.Structure, age, and tectonic development of the Huoshishan-Niujuanzi ophiolitic mélange, Beishan, southernmost Altaids[J].Gondwana Research, 2014, 25:820-841. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2013.05.006

    Wakabayashi J, Dilek Y.Introduction:Characteristics and tectonic settings of mélanges, and their significance for societal and engineer-ing problems[J].The Geological Society of America Special Paper, 2011, 480:V-X. doi: 10.1130/2011.2480(00)

    Kemkin I V, Khanchuk A I, Kemkina R A.Accretionary prisms of the SikhoteAlin Orogenic Belt:composition, structure and significance for reconstruction of the geodynamic evolution of the eastern Asian margin[J].Journal of Geodynamics, 2016, 102:202-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2016.10.002

    邓晋福, 冯艳芳, 狄永军, 等.古亚洲构造域侵入岩时-空演化框架[J].地质论评, 2015, 61(6):1211-1224 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DZLP201506003.htm
    张元元, 郭召杰.甘新交界红柳河蛇绿岩形成和侵位年龄的准确限定及大地构造意义[J].岩石学报, 2008, 24(4):804-809. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98200804019
    侯青叶, 王忠, 刘金宝, 等.北山月牙山蛇绿岩地球化学特征及SHRIMP定年[J].现代地质, 2012, 26(5):174-184. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xddz201205022

    Ao S J, Xiao W J, Han C M, et al.Cambrian to Early Silurian Ophiolite and Accretionary processes in the Beishan Collage, NW China:Implications for thear Chitecture of the southern Altaids[J].Geological Magazine, 2012, 149(4):606-625. doi: 10.1017/S0016756811000884

    胡新茁, 赵国春, 胡新悦, 等.内蒙古北山地区月牙山蛇绿质构造混杂岩带地质特征、形成时代及大地构造意义[J].地质通报, 2015, 34(2/3):205-216. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2015020318&flag=1
    于福生, 王春英, 漆家福, 等.甘新交界红柳河地区早志留世蛇绿混杂岩的厘定及大地构造意义[J].矿物岩石, 2000, 20(4):60-66. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kwys200004012

    Xin H, Tian J, Teng X, et al.The recognition of the Late Silurian SSZ-type ophiolite and Baiyunshan fore-arc basin in Baiyunshan area, Inner Mongolia and its tectonic significance[J].Journal of Earth Science, 2020(in press).

    郑荣国, 吴泰然, 张文, 等.北山地区月牙山-洗肠井蛇绿岩的地球化学特征及形成环境[J].地质学报, 2012, 86(6):961-971. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb201206010
    武鹏, 王国强, 李向民, 等.甘肃北山地区牛圈子蛇绿岩的形成时代及地质意义[J].地质通报, 2012, 31(12):2032-2037. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZQYD201212012.htm
    徐学义, 何世平, 王洪亮, 等.中国西北部地质概论[M].北京:科学出版社, 2008, 1-358.

    Song D F, Xiao W J, Han C M, et al.Polyphase deformation of a Paleozoic forearc-arc complex in the Beishan orogen, NW China[J].Tectonophysics, 2014, 632:224-243. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.030

    宋东方, 肖文交, 韩春明, 等.北山中部增生造山过程:构造变形和40Ar-39Ar年代学制约[J].岩石学报, 2018, 34(7):2087-2098. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94579X/20187/676094731.html
    严加永, 吕庆田, 孟贵祥, 等.内蒙古北山地区地球物理场特征与构造分区及深部结构研究[J].地球物理学进展, 2009, (2):439-447. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqwlxjz200902009
    牛文超, 辛后田, 段连峰, 等.内蒙古北山地区百合山蛇绿混杂岩带的厘定及其洋盆俯冲极性——基于1:5万清河沟幅地质图的新认识[J].中国地质, 2019, 46(5):977-994. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/zgdizhi201905004
    王国强, 李向民, 徐学义, 等.甘肃北山红石山蛇绿岩锆石U-Pb年代学研究及构造意义[J].岩石学报, 2014, 30(6):1685-1694. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98201406011

    Shi Y R, Li L L, Kröner A, et al.Carboniferous Alaskan-type complex along the Sino-Mongolian boundary, southern margin of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Acta Geochimica, 2017, 36(2):1-15. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgdqhx-e201702015

    魏志军, 黄增保, 金霞, 等.甘肃红石山地区蛇绿混杂岩地质特征[J].西北地质, 2004, 37(1):13-18. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdz200402003
    黄增保, 金霞.甘肃北山红石山蛇绿混杂岩带中基性火山岩构造环境分析[J].中国地质, 2006, 33(5):1030-1037. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgdizhi200605011
    卢进才, 史冀忠, 牛亚卓, 等.内蒙古西部北山-银额地区石炭纪-二叠纪层序地层与沉积演化[J].岩石学报, 2018, 34(10):3101-3115. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98201810017
    王小红, 杨建国, 谢燮, 等.甘肃北山红石山基性-超基性岩体的成因类型及构造意义[J].西北地质, 2013, 46(1):40-55. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdz201301005
    贾元琴, 赵志雄, 许海, 等.北山风雷山地区白山组流纹岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及构造环境[J].中国地质, 2016, 43(1):91-98. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgdizhi201601006
    任云伟, 任邦方, 牛文超, 等.内蒙古哈珠地区石炭纪白山组火山岩:北山北部晚古生代活动陆缘岩浆作用的产物[J].地球科学, 2019, 44(1):312-327. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=DQKX201901024
    李治, 朱文斌, 吴海林, 等.北山马鬃山地区野马泉和勒巴泉韧性剪切带构造变形特征与年代学约束[J].高校地质学报, 2019, 25(6):932-942. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gxdzxb201906012
    余吉远, 李向民, 王国强, 等.甘肃北山地区辉铜山和帐房山蛇绿岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及地质意义[J].地质通报, 2012, 31(12):2038-2045. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZQYD201212013.htm
    李锦轶, 张进, 杨天南, 等.北亚造山区南部及其毗邻地区地壳构造分区与构造演化[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2009, 39(04):584-605. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cckjdxxb200904002
    孟令顺, 管烨, 齐立, 等.格尔木-额济纳旗地学断面及其邻区重力场与深部地壳构造[J].地球物理学报, 1995, 38(S2):36-45. http://www.cqvip.com/qk/94718X/1995A02/1668119.html
    余钦范, 楼海, 胡中栋, 等.格尔木-额济纳旗地学断面岩石圈结构的磁场分析[J].地球物理学报, 1995, 38(S2):58-70. http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_chinese-journal-geophysics_thesis/0201253061865.html
    高勇, 丁华磊, 郭瑞军, 等.北山造山带公路井-三个井韧性剪切带构造变形特征及其地质意义[J].中国地质调查, 2016, 3(1):26-34. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgdzdc201601005
    梅华林, 于海峰, 李铨, 等.甘肃北山地区首次发现榴辉岩和古元古花岗质岩石[J].科学通报, 1998, 43(19):2105-2111. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kxtb199819022
    许志琴, 杨经绥, 张建新, 等.阿尔金断裂两侧构造单元的对比及岩石圈剪切机制[J].地质学报, 1999, 73(3):193-205. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199900084695
    孟繁聪, 张建新, 相振群, 等.塔里木盆地东北缘敦煌群的形成和演化:锆石U-Pb年代学和Lu-Hf同位素证据[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(1):59-76. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YSXB201101005.htm

    Lu S N, Li H K, Zhang C L, et al.Geological and geochronological evidence for the Precambrian evolution of the Tarim Craton and surrounding continental fragments[J].Precambrian Research, 2008, 160:94-107. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.025

    Long X P, Yuan C, Sun M, et al.Reworking of the Tarim Craton by underplating of mantle plume-derived magmas:Evidence from Neoproterozoic granitoids in the Kuluketage area, NW China[J].Precambrian Res., 2011, 187:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2011.02.001

    左国朝, 刘春燕, 白万成, 等.北山泥盆纪碰撞造山火山-磨拉石地质构造及地球化学特征[J].甘肃地质学报, 1995, 4(1):35-43. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96503A/199501/1732982.html

    Guo Q Q, Xiao W J, Hou Q L, et al.Construction of Late Devonian Dundunshan arc in the Beishan orogen and its implication for tectonics of southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Lithos, 2014, 184/187:361-378. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.11.007

    田健, 辛后田, 滕学建, 等.内蒙古北山造山带白云山地区上泥盆统墩墩山组火山岩的厘定及其构造意义[J].岩石学报, 2020, 36(2):509-525. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98202002011
    潘志龙, 王硕, 邱振, 等.内蒙古北山地区咸水沟一带早石炭世红柳园组火山岩地球化学、锆石U-Pb年龄及Hf同位素特征[J].地质调查与研究, 2017, 40(2):99-108. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=qhwjyjjz201702003
    陈超, 潘志龙, 修迪, 等.北山地区红柳园组沉积时代、沉积环境及源区构造背景分析[J].沉积学报, 2017, 35(3):470-479. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cjxb201703005
    王立社, 杨建国, 谢春林, 等.甘肃北山火石山哈尔根头口布花岗岩年代学、地球化学及其地质意义.地质学报, 2009, 83(3):377-387. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb200903007
    李舢, 王涛, 童英, 等.北山柳园地区双峰山早泥盆世A型花岗岩的确定及构造演化意义[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2009, 28(5):407-422. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yskwxzz200905001
    李舢, 王涛, 童英, 等.北山辉铜山泥盆纪钾长花岗岩锆石U-Pb年龄、成因及构造意义[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(10):3055-3070. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98201110021
    内蒙古地质矿产局.内蒙古自治区岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1996.
    陈超, 修迪, 潘志龙, 等.北山造山带中部早古生代伸展构造体制:来自石板井辉长岩的年代学及地球化学证据[J].地质学报, 2017, 91(8):1161-1673. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DZXE201708001.htm

    Zhang W, Pease V, Wu T R, et al.Discovery of an adakite-like pluton near Dongqiyishan (Beishan, NW China) - Its age and tectonic significance[J].Lithos, 2012, 142/143:148-160. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.02.021

    Song D F, Xiao W J, Windley B F, et al.A Paleozoic Japan-type subduction-accretion system in the Beishan orogenic collage, southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Lithos, 2015, 224/225:195-213. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2015.03.005

    李敏, 辛后田, 田健, 等.北山造山带公婆泉岩浆弧的组成、时代及其大地构造意义[J].地球科学, 2020, 网络首发.doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.123.

    Ao S J, Xiao W J, Windley B F, et al.Paleozoic accretionary orogenesis in the eastern Beishan orogen:Constraints from zircon U-Pb and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology[J].Gondwana Research, 2016, 30:224-235. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2015.03.004

    王鑫玉, 袁超, 龙晓平, 等.北山造山带尖山和石板井花岗岩年代学、地球化学研究及其地质意义[J].地球化学, 2018, 47(1):63-78. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqhx201801005
    郑荣国, 吴泰然, 张文, 等.甘肃北山中带早泥盆世的构造-岩浆作用:来自公婆泉花岗岩体年代学和地球化学证据[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 48(4):603-616. http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=42762532
    徐旭明, 程海峰, 段炳鑫, 等.内蒙古北山地区标山一带北山岩群长石石英岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及地质意义[J].新疆地质, 2018, 36(3):393-398. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xjdz201803019
    杨富林, 赵志雄, 贾文艳, 等.内蒙古北山地区北山岩群形成时代探讨[J].地质调查与研究, 2015, 39(2):89-94. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=qhwjyjjz201602002
    张正平, 段炳鑫, 孟庆涛, 等.内蒙古北山地区北山岩群斜长角闪岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb定年及其地质意义[J].地质与勘探, 2017, 53(6):1129-1139. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzykt201706008
    李敏, 辛后田, 任邦方, 等.内蒙古哈珠地区晚古生代花岗岩类成因及其构造意义[J].地球科学, 2019, 44(1):328-343. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqkx201901023
    牛亚卓, 魏建设, 史冀忠, 等.甘肃北山地区北部上石炭统火山岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及其构造意义[J].地质通报, 2013, 32(11):1720-1727. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20131104&flag=1
    赵志雄, 贾元琴, 许海, 等.北山交叉沟石英闪长岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年龄及构造意义[J].地质学报, 2015, 89(7):1210-1218. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb201507005
    赵志雄, 熊煜, 贾元琴, 等.北山独龙包地区晚石炭世陆缘弧岩浆作用-花岗闪长岩锆石U-Pb年龄及地球化学证据[J].地质论评, 2018, 64(3):597-609. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzlp201803007
    杨帅师, 陈志勇, 康小龙, 等.内蒙古西部北山地区中、上二叠统双堡塘组地层古生物特征[J].地质通报, 2005, 24(3):272-276. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20050352&flag=1
    陈智斌, 于洋, 薄海军.内蒙古额济纳地区奥陶纪火山岩地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].地球科学, 2020, 45(2):503-518. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqkx202002012
    任邦方, 任云伟, 牛文超, 等.内蒙古北山哈珠东山泥盆系雀儿山群火山岩锆石U-Pb年龄、Hf同位素特征及其地质意义[J].地球科学, 2019, 44(1):298-311. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqkx201901021
    谢春林, 杨建国, 王立社, 等.甘肃北山地区古亚洲南缘古生代岛弧带位置的讨论[J].地质学报, 2009, 83(11):1584-1600. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb200911004

    Zuo G, Zhang S, He G, et al.Plate tectonic characteristics during the early Paleozoic in Beishan near the Sino-Mongolian border region, China[J].Tectonophysics, 1991, 188:385-392. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(91)90466-6

    李锦轶, 曲军峰, 张进, 等.中国北方造山区显生宙地质历史重建与成矿地质背景研究进展[J].地质通报, 2013, 32(2/3):207-219. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZQYD2013Z1000.htm
    张克信, 潘桂棠, 何卫红, 等.中国构造-地层大区划分新方案[J].地球科学, 2015, 40(2):206-233. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DQKX201502003.htm
    潘桂棠, 陆松年, 肖庆辉, 等.中国大地构造阶段划分和演化[J].地学前缘, 2016, 23(6):1-23. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dxqy201606001

    Yuan Y, Zong K, He Z, et al.Geochemical evidence for Paleozoic crustal growth and tectonic conversion in the Northern Beishan Orogenic Belt, southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Lithos, 2018, 302/303:189-202. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2017.12.026

    李春昱, 王荃, 等.我国北部边陲及邻区的古板块构造与欧亚大陆的形成[C]//中国北方板块构造文集, 第一集.北京: 地质出版社, 1983: 3-16.
    李继亮.增生型造山带的基本特征[J].地质通报, 2004, 23(9/10):947-951. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=200409168&flag=1
    肖文交, 李继亮, 宋东方, 等.增生型造山带结构解析与时空制约[J].地球科学, 2019, 44(5):1661-1687. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqkx201905019
    李志琛.敦煌地块变质岩系时代新认识[J].中国区域地质, 1994, 2:131-134. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199400786471
    周海, 陈亮, 孙勇.北山造山带南带中元古代副变质岩的锆石U-Pb年代学和Hf同位素研究——对北山造山带南带前寒武纪物质演化的探索[J].地质学报, 2018, 92(5):44-61. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb201805003
    袁学诚.论中国大陆基底构造[J].地球物理学报, 1995, 38(4):448-459. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=1710974
    夏林圻, 张国伟, 夏祖春, 等.天山古生代洋盆开启、闭合时限的岩石学约束——来自震旦纪、石炭纪火山岩的证据[J].地质通报, 2002, 21(2):55-62. http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/gbc/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20020220&flag=1
    叶晓峰, 宗克清, 张泽明, 等.北山造山带南缘柳园地区新元古代花岗岩的地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].地质通报, 2013, 32(2/3):307-317. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZQYD2013Z1009.htm
    姜洪颖, 贺振宇, 宗克清, 等.北山造山带南缘北山杂岩的锆石U-Pb定年和Hf同位素研究[J].岩石学报, 2013, 29(11):3949-3967. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98201311024

    Yuan Y, Zong K Q, He Z Y, et al.Geochemical and geochronological evidence for a former early Neoproterozoic microcontinent in the South Beishan Orogenic Belt, southernmost Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Precambrian Research, 2015, 266:409-424. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2015.05.034

    杨经绥, 吴才来, 陈松永, 等.甘肃北山地区榴辉岩的变质年龄:来自锆石的U-Pb同位素定年证据[J].中国地质, 2006, 33(2):317-325. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=21773286
    牛文超, 任邦方, 任云伟, 等.内蒙古北山地区发现新元古代片麻状花岗岩:锆石U-Pb定年证据[J].中国地质, 2017, 44(2):409-410. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgdizhi201702019
    牛文超, 任邦方, 任云伟, 等.北山北带新元古代岩浆记录:来自内蒙古哈珠地区片麻状花岗岩的证据[J].地球科学, 2019, 44(1):284-297. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=DQKX201901022

    Li Z X, Bogdanova S V, Collins A S, et al.Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia:A synthesis[J].Precambrian Research, 2008, 160(1/2):179-210. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301926807001635

    陆松年, 相振群, 李怀坤, 等.华北克拉通对罗迪尼亚超大陆事件的响应——GOSEN连接假设[J].地质学报, 2012, 86(9):1396-1406. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb201209006
    王育习, 侯岚, 周庆华, 等.甘肃北山石板井地区花岗岩成因探讨[J].新疆地质, 2014, 32(3):377-385. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xjdz201403019
    谢建强, 第鹏飞, 杨婧, 等.甘肃北山地区花牛山群变英安岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].西北地质, 2018, 51(1):54-64. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdz201801007
    余吉远, 王国强, 李向民, 等.北山地区花牛山群的重新厘定——来自火山岩球化学证据[J].新疆地质, 2015, 33(4):537-543. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xjdz201504022
    赵泽辉, 郭召杰, 王毅.甘肃北山柳园地区花岗岩类的年代学、地球化学特征及构造意义[J].岩石学报, 2007, 23(8):1847-1860. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98200708007

    Guo Q Q, Chung S L, Xiao W J, et al.Petrogenesis and tectonic implications of Late Devonian arc volcanic rocks in southern Beishan orogen, NW China:Geochemical and Nd-Sr-Hf isotopic constraints[J].Lithos, 2017, 278/281:84-96. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2017.01.017

    Ernst R E, Buchan K L, Campbell I H.Frontiers in large igneous provinceresearch[J].Lithos, 2005, 79(3/4):271-297. http://www.largeigneousprovinces.org/sites/default/files/LIPFrontiers.pdf

    夏林圻, 夏祖春, 徐学义, 等.利用地球化学方法判别大陆玄武岩和岛弧玄武岩[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2007, 26(1):77-89. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yskwxzz200701011

    Zhao Y, Sun Y, Diwu C R, et al.Paleozoic intrusive rocks from the Dunhuang tectonic belt, NW China:Constraints on the tectonic evolution of the southernmost Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2017, 138:562-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.02.037

    Feng L M, Lin S F, Davis D W, et al.Dunhuang Tectonic Belt(DTB) in northwestern China as a part of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt:Structural and U-Pb geochronological evidence[J].Tectonophysics, 2018, 747/748:281-297. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2018.09.008

    Feng L M, Lin S F, Li L M.Constraints on the tectonic evolution of the southern central Asian orogenic belt from early Permian-middle Triassic granitoids from the central Dunhuang orogenic belt, NW China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences.2020, 194:1-17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136791202030064X

    Zonenshain L P.The Evolution of Central Asiatic Geosynclines through Sea-FloorSpreading[J].Tectonophysics, 1973, 19(3):213-232. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(73)90020-6

    Zonenshain L P, Kuzmin M I.The Khan-Taishir ophiolitic complex of Western Mongolia, its petrology, origin and comparison with other ophiolitic complexes[J].Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1978, 67:95-109. doi: 10.1007/BF00371637

    Jian P, Körner A, Jahn B M, et al.Zircon dating of Neoproterozoic and Cambrian ophiolites in West Mongolia and implications for the timing of orogenic processes in the central part of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Earth-Science Reviews, 2014, 133(6):62-93.

    Helo C, Hegner E, Kröner A, et al.Geochemical signature of Paleozoic accretionary complexes of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt in South Mongolia:Constraints on arc environments and crustal growth[J].Chemical Geology, 2006, 227(3/4):236-257. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009254105004183

    Taylor J, Webb L, Johnson C, et al.The lost South Gobi microcontinent:Protolith studies of metamorphic tectonites and implications for the evolution of continental crust in southeastern Mongolia[J].Geosciences, 2013, 3(3):543-584. doi: 10.3390/geosciences3030543

    张金龙, 陈超, 潘志龙, 等.内蒙古北山西林淘勒二断井组的厘定与沉积环境分析[J].地质调查与研究.2017, 40(4):274-280. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=qhwjyjjz201704004
    刘明强, 党引业, 龚全胜.甘肃北山平头山逆冲推覆构造的特征[J].西北地质, 2002, 35(1):22-27. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdz200201003
    郑亚东, 张青, 王玉芳, 等.北山-南戈壁地区侏罗纪巨型逆冲推覆体[J].内蒙古地质, 1998, 4:1-12. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-NMGZ804.000.htm
    赵志雄, 高勇, 陈海东, 等.内蒙古1: 5万风雷山等4幅区域地质矿产调查报告.内蒙古地质矿产勘察院.2014.
    张正平, 程海峰, 徐旭明, 等.内蒙古1: 5万黑红山等三幅区域地质矿产调查报告.河北省区域地质矿产调查研究所.2018.
    辛后田, 滕学建, 张永, 等.阴山成矿带小狐狸山和雅布赖地区地质矿产调查项目成果报告.中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心.2019.
    梁国庆, 徐旭明, 孟庆涛, 等.内蒙古1: 5万旱山等四幅区域地质矿产调查报告.河北省区域地质矿产调查研究所.2014.
    孟宪锋, 段炳鑫, 董洪凯, 等.内蒙古1: 5万标山等四幅区域地质矿产调查报告.河北省区域地质矿产调查研究所.2015.
    陈超, 张金龙, 张欢, 等.内蒙古1: 5万西林陶勒等四幅区域地质矿产调查报告.河北省区域地质矿产调查研究所.2016.
    潘志龙, 刘增校, 魏文通, 等.内蒙古1: 5万基东等四幅区域地质矿产调查报告.河北省区域地质矿产调查研究所.2015.
    刘畅, 卫彦升, 杨五宝, 等.内蒙古1: 5万额勒斯图浑迪等五幅区域地质矿产调查报告.山西省地质调查院.2016.
    闫涛, 卫彦升, 杨五宝, 等.内蒙古1: 5万甜水井等三幅区域地质矿产调查报告.山西省地质调查院.2018.
  • 期刊类型引用(10)

    1. 王剑,张豪薇,张健,沈利军,张建勇,付修根. 论羌塘含油气盆地关键地层划分对比问题. 海相油气地质. 2024(01): 17-29 . 百度学术
    2. 刘佳,宋艾,丁林,苏涛,周浙昆. 青藏高原及其周边古近纪综合地层、生物群与古地理演化. 中国科学:地球科学. 2024(04): 1308-1342 . 百度学术
    3. 毕文军,张佳伟,李亚林,邓玉珍. 西藏中部羌塘地体白垩纪以来隆升剥露过程. 地学前缘. 2023(02): 18-34 . 百度学术
    4. Li-jun Shen,Jian-yong Zhang,Shao-yun Xiong,Jian Wang,Xiu-gen Fu,Bo Zheng,Zhong-wei Wang. Evaluation of the oil and gas preservation conditions, source rocks, and hydrocarbongenerating potential of the Qiangtang Basin: New evidence from the scientific drilling project. China Geology. 2023(02): 187-207 . 必应学术
    5. 王剑,王忠伟,付修根,宋春彦,谭富文,韦恒叶. 青藏高原羌塘盆地首口油气科探井(QK-1)新发现. 科学通报. 2022(03): 321-328 . 百度学术
    6. 赵嘉峰,王剑,付修根,沈利军,郑波,韦恒叶,张豪薇,唐为. 西藏羌塘盆地古近纪康托组沉积物源及构造背景分析. 地质论评. 2022(01): 93-110 . 百度学术
    7. 寇琳琳,李海龙,李振宏,董晓朋,崔加伟,黄婷. 青藏高原东北缘烟筒山构造带二叠系红泉组沉积时代及物源示踪. 地质通报. 2022(Z1): 315-326 . 本站查看
    8. 王剑,付修根,沈利军,谭富文,宋春彦,陈文彬. 论羌塘盆地油气勘探前景. 地质论评. 2020(05): 1091-1113 . 百度学术
    9. 赵珍,吴珍汉,杨易卓,季长军. 羌塘中部陆相红层时代的U-Pb年龄约束. 地质论评. 2020(05): 1155-1171 . 百度学术
    10. 吴珍汉,季长军,赵珍,陈程. 羌塘盆地中部侏罗系埋藏史和生烃史. 地质学报. 2020(10): 2823-2833 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(3)

图(3)  /  表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3731
  • HTML全文浏览量:  432
  • PDF下载量:  2819
  • 被引次数: 13
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-09-09
  • 修回日期:  2019-11-11
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-08-15
  • 刊出日期:  2020-09-14

目录

/

返回文章
返回