二连盆地白北凹陷白垩系构造—热演化史恢复与油气潜力分析

    Restoration of Cretaceous structural-thermal evolution history and analysis of oil and gas potential in the Baibei Sag of the Erlian Basin

    • 摘要:
      研究目的 二连盆地是中国重要的含油气盆地之一,白北凹陷是二连盆地众多含油气凹陷中具有勘探开发价值的凹陷之一,发育阿尔善组、腾格尔组等多套烃源岩。探究二连盆地白北凹陷构造热演化历史,对研究区油气资源勘探开发具有重要意义。
      研究方法 结合测温数据,根据地震、录井资料,采用泥岩声波时差法和镜质体反射率法,恢复研究区赛汉塔拉组和二连达布苏组剥蚀厚度,进而恢复研究区白垩纪以来的埋藏史和构造热演化史。
      研究结果 结果表明,二连盆地白北凹陷表现出早期分次洼差异沉降、中期大范围均匀沉降、晚期整体隆升剥蚀的构造发育特征。S1井处,阿尔善组—赛汉塔拉组沉积期,研究区快速沉降,沉积末期达到最大埋深后,发生第一期抬升剥蚀,剥蚀量约1314 m;赛汉塔拉组—二连达布苏组沉积期再次快速沉降,而后发生第二期抬升剥蚀,剥蚀量约170 m;古近纪以来,凹陷处于稳定沉降阶段,沉积了100 m的新生界。早白垩世末最大埋深时平均地温梯度3.65℃/100 m,处于热异常状态,之后逐渐降低至现今地温梯度2.94℃/100 m,大地热流值为58.8 mW/m2
      结论 白北凹陷烃源岩成熟度受古地温和埋深控制,在77 Ma左右达到最大热演化程度(腾格尔组0.50%<Ro<0.68%,阿尔善组0.72%<Ro<0.76%)。都红木组和赛汉塔拉组处于未成熟阶段,几乎无生烃潜力。早白垩世西伯断裂及其次级断裂对油气成藏有较大影响,而早白垩世末发育的张性断裂对下白垩统下部油藏破坏性较小。研究获得的地温梯度、大地热流等参数对于二连盆地古今地温场特征研究具有重要意义,同时可为研究区油气勘探提供理论支持。

       

      Abstract:
      This paper is the result of geothermal geological survey engineering.
      Objective Erlian Basin is one of the important petroliferous basins in China. Baibei Sag is one of the important petroliferous basins in Erlian Basin with exploration and development value. It develops many source rock intervals such as Tengger Formation and Aershan Formation. Exploring the tectonic thermal evolution history of Baibei Sag in Erlian Basin is of great significance for the exploration and development of fossil energy in Baibei Sag.
      Methods According to seismic and logging data, combined with temperature measurement data, the erosion thickness of Saihantala Formation and Erliandabusu Formation is restored by using mudstone acoustic time difference method and vitrinite reflectance method, and then the burial history and tectonic thermal evolution history of Baibei Sag in Erlian Basin since Cretaceous are restored.
      Results The results indicate that Baibei Sag in Erlian Basin exhibits structural development characteristics of "differential subsidence in the early stage, uniform subsidence on a large scale in the middle stage, and overall uplift and erosion in the late stage". At well S1, during the deposition period from Aershan Formation to Saihantala Formation, the study area subsided rapidly. After reaching the maximum burial depth at the end of deposition, the first stage of uplift and erosion occurred, with erosion amount of about 1314 m. During the deposition period from Saihantala Formation to Erliandabusu Formation, rapid subsidence occurred again, and then the second stage of uplift and erosion occurred, with erosion amount of about 170 m. Since Paleogene, the sag has been in a stable subsidence stage, depositing 100 m of Cenozoic strata. At the end of the early Cretaceous, the average geothermal gradient at the maximum burial depth was 3.65℃/100 m, which was in a state of thermal anomaly, and then gradually decreased to the current geothermal gradient of 2.94℃/100 m, with a geothermal flow value of 58.8 mW/m2.
      Conclusions The maturity of source rocks is controlled by paleotemperature and burial depth, reaching the maximum degree of thermal evolution at about 77 Ma (Tengger Formation: 0.50%<Ro<0.68%; Aershan Formation: 0.72%<Ro<0.76%). However, Duhongmu Formation and Saihantala Formation are in an immature stage and have almost no hydrocarbon generation potential. It is of great significance to study the characteristics of paleo−modern geothermal field in Erlian Basin and provide theoretical support for oil and gas exploration in the study area.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回